sorry, what i meant was that it was pushing an lbgt agenda under the guise of a marketing campaign
just because you're a "productive hetero normative" person doesn't mean that your lifestyle dictates your fashion sense. so why all this focus on transgenders, homosexuals, black men in skirts, crack addicts, hypersexualised or androgynous men on the catwalk? that's the point i'm trying to make. when i say fashion, i obviously don't mean brooks bros or gap.
i hate it because it seems to carry the message that "this kind of fashion is for people like these; this not just about clothes also an alternative lifestyle."
this is the reason why i joined SZ. because the sensibilities here do not contain any such connotations - it's pure and objective fashion.
just because you're a "productive hetero normative" person doesn't mean that your lifestyle dictates your fashion sense. so why all this focus on transgenders, homosexuals, black men in skirts, crack addicts, hypersexualised or androgynous men on the catwalk? that's the point i'm trying to make. when i say fashion, i obviously don't mean brooks bros or gap.
i hate it because it seems to carry the message that "this kind of fashion is for people like these; this not just about clothes also an alternative lifestyle."
this is the reason why i joined SZ. because the sensibilities here do not contain any such connotations - it's pure and objective fashion.
Comment