^ yes, please.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What are you wearing today?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by merzi'm confused, was eat me's wording somehow suggestive?Selling CCP, Harnden, Raf, Rick etc.
http://www.stylezeitgeist.com/forums...me-other-stuff
Comment
-
-
leave my big hands out of this snafsta,or i will bitch slap u back 2 bethnal! hahaha :) p.s dont go cloth house they r crooks!
mona,out fit is lovely and very elegant although i do like the looks when you wear ur big boots!merz: your look has all the grace of george michael at the tail end of a coke binge.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MonaDahlhey, guys, don't go getting your knickers in a twist. I don't think anyone here is looking to be offended, and barring that there's no way this kind of stuff could offend me. Calm your worries, if I were going to leave in a huff it would have been when I first joined and someone offered to take nude pictures of me.
The only remotely bothersome thing in any of these posts was the implication that for an outfit to be great it has to be "next level" (I'll confess I'm still not sure what that's supposed to mean). The thread is called what are you wearing today and that's what I was wearing. Not looking to defy any boundaries really (maybe just lightly tap them) but I didn't realize that was a part of the criteria. I wear what I like.
Also if anything you guys should ralize that as a group you give me way too much credit, something I suspect comes from my being female.
Oh and nice outfit BTW.Selling CCP, Harnden, Raf, Rick etc.
http://www.stylezeitgeist.com/forums...me-other-stuff
Comment
-
-
Since Mona hasn't taken offence my point is moot, but I was saying that the phrasing was such that someone could be offended by it (I know women who would), and that's generally not the response one hopes to elicit when one gives a compliment.An artist is not paid for his labor, but for his vision. - James Whistler
Originally posted by BBSCCPI order 1 in every size, please, for every occasion
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Fuuma View PostI like girls, I like holding their hands, I like their hair, I like touching their privates, I like their voice, I like when they're angry, sad and happy. No doubt it influences how I enjoy their outfits. Not sure we need to push the discussion any further though, what is to be found here is understood by most.
Oh and nice outfit BTW.
Its all in the wording chaps,all in the wording.Last edited by SHYE_POSER; 06-10-2009, 03:27 PM.merz: your look has all the grace of george michael at the tail end of a coke binge.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by merzslippery slope detected.
Or maybe it's just my personal bias for how it could have been otherwise phrased.An artist is not paid for his labor, but for his vision. - James Whistler
Originally posted by BBSCCPI order 1 in every size, please, for every occasion
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by merzmy post got eaten. weird.
slippery slope detected. seriously, imagine this thread - fuck, never mind the thread, imagine this forum without shit that could possibly offend someone. granted, some comments are taken more seriously than others. the implied suggestion of some posters requiring more eggshell-walking than others was what prompted my response, is all :)
i like to think myself an equal-opportunity offender.Selling CCP, Harnden, Raf, Rick etc.
http://www.stylezeitgeist.com/forums...me-other-stuff
Comment
-
-
Time to split the WAYWT thread into:
-WAYWT-respekt
-WAYWT-raunchiness includedSelling CCP, Harnden, Raf, Rick etc.
http://www.stylezeitgeist.com/forums...me-other-stuff
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MonaDahlhey, guys, don't go getting your knickers in a twist. I don't think anyone here is looking to be offended, and barring that there's no way this kind of stuff could offend me. Calm your worries, if I were going to leave in a huff it would have been when I first joined and someone offered to take nude pictures of me.
The only remotely bothersome thing in any of these posts was the implication that for an outfit to be great it has to be "next level" (I'll confess I'm still not sure what that's supposed to mean). The thread is called what are you wearing today and that's what I was wearing. Not looking to defy any boundaries really (maybe just lightly tap them) but I didn't realize that was a part of the criteria. I wear what I like.
Also if anything you guys should ralize that as a group you give me way too much credit, something I suspect comes from my being female.Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde
StyleZeitgeist Magazine
Comment
-
-
^ Black and light blue are hard to associate.
Black upper part + light colour under = unbalanced oufit (dark colour should be in the lower part, light, in the upper, since a dark is a "heavier" colour).
Only suntanned legs should be shown.
But it's maybe a Duchamp outfit, where you have on purpose reversed the balance.
Comment
-
Comment