Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What are you reading?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • plasmoplas
    Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 68

    musicophilia: tales of music and the brain

    I just finished reading Oliver Sacks' book Musicophelia, which I highly recommend as a very thoughtful, readable, and entertaining (layman) discussion about music-related brain/body disorders. More than a series of anectodes, Sacks delves into the neurological basis of music-related symptoms from his many years as a physician and neurologist.

    For those who wish to save $10 and three hours, there are a couple videos up here:

    Last edited by plasmoplas; 12-06-2010, 08:09 PM.

    Comment

    • Enaml
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 890

      I did a research project on music and the brain for a behavioral neuroscience course I took last semester and we used Musicophelia a bit for it. Just about everything I've read by Sacks is fascinating.
      How do you guys like the fit of my new CCP suit?

      Comment

      • Faust
        kitsch killer
        • Sep 2006
        • 37849

        Has anyone read Super Sad True Love Story yet?
        Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde

        StyleZeitgeist Magazine

        Comment

        • michael_kard
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2010
          • 2152

          I've been reading quite a few stuff on rawhide tanning processes for an assignment (I compared my AD leather with an A-2 jacket from WWII)...

          Other recent book purchases include the Stephen Sprouse book, and some Heiner Muller (Best author)
          ENDYMA / Archival fashion & Consignment
          Helmut Lang 1986-2005 | Ann Demeulemeester | Raf Simons | Burberry Prorsum | and more...

          Comment

          • proxious
            Junior Member
            • Dec 2010
            • 4

            "confederacy of duncess" one of the best books

            Comment

            • galia
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2009
              • 1702

              Originally posted by michael_kard View Post
              Heiner Muller


              my favourite is Medeamaterial

              Comment

              • Fuuma
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2006
                • 4050

                Originally posted by galia View Post
                Thank you Sigmund. Not at all, I was way more insecure when I pretended to like it because I felt I had to, because if I didn't it meant I wasn't smart enought to "get it". Now I feel secure in knowing that I get it and still find the guy annoying.

                I understand that he is a great writer and everything, and I admire the craft (which is about the only thing I enjoy in his books tbh)... I just really don't like him
                You need to hear what A's father says about Nabokov (whom he translated in french). The later insisted he spoke perfect french and would make up words at some points and argue with the former that they should be used. If you know A's father I'm sure you can see how that went (they stopped speaking to each other and would write letters signed by their wives/gfs).
                Selling CCP, Harnden, Raf, Rick etc.
                http://www.stylezeitgeist.com/forums...me-other-stuff

                Comment

                • galia
                  Senior Member
                  • Jun 2009
                  • 1702

                  I am imagining that right now and laughing

                  I'm sure he was good fun, in an extremely annoying way

                  Comment

                  • Acéphale
                    Senior Member
                    • Apr 2010
                    • 444

                    « From the earliest days of man there has endured the conviction that there is an order of existence which is entirely strange to him. It does indeed seem that the strict order of the visible world is only a semblance, one providing certain gross materials which become the basis for subtle improvisations of invisible powers. Hence, it may appear to some that a leafless tree is not a tree but a signpost to another realm; that an old house is not a house but a thing possessing a will of its own; that the dead may throw off that heavy blanket of earth to walk in their sleep, and in ours. And these are merely a few of the infinite variations on the themes of the natural order as it is usually conceived.

                    But is there really a strange world? Of course. Are there, then, two worlds? Not at all. There is only our own world and it alone is alien to us, intrinsically so by virtue of its lack of mysteries. If only it actually were deranged by invisible powers, if only it were susceptible to real strangeness, perhaps it would seem more like a home to us, and less like an empty room filled with the echoes of this dreadful improvising. To think that we might have found comfort in a world suited to our nature, only to end up in one so resoundingly strange! »



                    ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα

                    Comment

                    • BECOMING-INTENSE
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2008
                      • 1868



                      Chin P'ing Mei
                      Volume One: The Gathering(1993)


                      Translated by David Tod Roy

                      Hopefully when I get to volume three, he would atleast
                      have finished translating volume four, but I doubt it ...

                      Are you afraid of women, Doctor?
                      Of course.

                      www.becomingmads.com

                      Comment

                      • Acéphale
                        Senior Member
                        • Apr 2010
                        • 444

                        « She could not speak, and yet she was speaking. Her tongue vibrated in such a way that she seemed to express the meanings of words without the words themselves. Then, suddenly, she let herself be carried away by a rush of words which she pronounced almost beneath her breath, with varied inflections, as if she wanted only to amuse herself with sounds and bursts of syllables. She gave the impression that, speaking a language whose infantile character prevented it from being taken for a language, she was making the meaningless words seem like incomprehensible ones. She said nothing, but to say nothing was for her an all too meaningful mode of expression, beneath which she succeeded in saying still less. She withdrew indefinitely from her babbling to enter into yet another, less serious babbling, which she nevertheless rejected as too serious, preparing herself by an endless retreat beyond all seriousness for repose in absolute puerility, until her vocabulary, through its nullity, took on the appearance of a sleep which was the very voice of seriousness. Then, as if in the depths she had suddenly felt herself under the surveillance of an implacable consciousness, she leaped back, cried out, opened terribly clairvoyant eyes and, halting her tale an instant: "No," she said, "it's not that. What you really are..." »



                        ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα

                        Comment

                        • een
                          Senior Member
                          • Sep 2006
                          • 317

                          ^Beautiful. Along with The Step Not Beyond, my favorite of Blanchot's fiction.

                          Comment

                          • deius
                            Member
                            • Jul 2009
                            • 30

                            Rene Char - where to begin? I have only seen his name referenced.
                            Originally posted by proxious View Post
                            "confederacy of duncess" one of the best books
                            dunces* and yes, it really is brilliant. The supporting characters are hilarious.

                            Javier Marias - Your Face Tomorrow trilogy. Part way through, it is worth picking up, and its reviews in the English press are not exaggerated. At first you are frustrated by the long, rambling, philosophical digressions that interrupt the narrative, but soon you realise that the narrative is less significant than the ideas themselves, and the voice works its way into your mind until the flow becomes natural.

                            Comment

                            • MJRH
                              Senior Member
                              • Nov 2006
                              • 418

                              corsair sanglot recommended Justine a few months back, and I just finished the Alexandria Quartet. Fine stuff, if you don't mind density!

                              Here is an excerpt from Monsieur, the first book of Durrell's Avignon Quintet, which I just began. Fitting, given the thread.

                              Language is all very fine and we cannot do without it but it is at the same time the worst invention of man, corrupting silence, tearing petals off the whole mind.
                              ain't no beauty queens in this locality

                              Comment

                              • Fade to Black
                                Senior Member
                                • Sep 2008
                                • 5340

                                gave up on Lolita after 60 or so pages. I liked Pale Fire, but feel I can only stomach one of Nabokov's, and that's it for me.

                                2/3ds through Henry Miller's Tropic of Cancer after starting it yesterday. Good stuff, some epic flights of poetic pontification and i like how he mixes the messy stuff into it seamlessly. The writing feels very real, very natural - he's a writer.
                                www.matthewhk.net

                                let me show you a few thangs

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X
                                😀
                                🥰
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎