Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lacroix Files for Bankruptcy Protection

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KodakII
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 388

    Lacroix Files for Bankruptcy Protection

    NYT
    May 29, 2009
    Lacroix Files for Bankruptcy Protection

    By SUZY MENKES
    Christian Lacroix, the French couturier whose artistic and exuberant pouf dresses propelled him to fame in the 1980s, became the latest victim of the global financial crisis Thursday as the U.S.-owned fashion house bearing his name filed for court protection from creditors.

    The voluntary petition, similar to Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States, was filed with the commercial court in Paris, which will decide whether to restructure or liquidate the company.

    Although Lacroix’s chief executive officer, Nicolas Topiol, emphasized that the brand intended to continue operating during the process, the news brings an end to a luxury business model for which Lacroix was the last of the Mohicans.

    Founded in 1987 by Bernard Arnault, chairman and chief executive of LVMH (Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton), the concept was to start with haute couture, at the apex of the luxury pyramid, and develop from it a range of ready-to-wear, accessories and fragrances. This was the system that had reaped mighty profits for established houses like Christian Dior and Chanel.

    But despite years of critical success, the company failed to break even, let alone turn a profit. Mr. Arnault sold Lacroix in 2005 to the Florida-based Falic Group, known for its Duty Free Americas chain. The Falic brothers aimed to refocus the luxury brand at the peak, subsequently suppressing the lower-priced clothing and jeans lines.

    “Since the acquisition of Christian Lacroix SNC, we have been committed to the brand and to its high-end development,” Mr. Topiol said in a statement. “We will continue to do so but the sharp downturn of the luxury market has significantly hurt our revenues.”

    The owners had been in discussion with potential financial partners and investors for the past year, according to Mr. Topiol, who said that “this process which was in its final phase, was directly hit by the conditions of the financial markets and could not be finalized prior to the filing.”

    According to people with knowledge of the situation, Lacroix was badly hit in the United States, where it has opened two stores in New York and Las Vegas and where buyers have recently reduced or canceled orders. Ready-to-wear sales for the coming autumn season were down 35 percent and losses for 2008 were €10 million, or $14 million, on overall revenues of approximately €30 million.

    Mr. Topiol’s statement said only that the “long-term strategy for repositioning of the brand was dramatically hindered” by the financial crisis.

    That has been evident for some time across the luxury sector, where even the biggest players are being hurt by recession and financial turmoil. LVMH, the world's biggest luxury goods company, recently scrapped a plan to open a Louis Vuitton flagship store in Tokyo. Early this year, Chanel announced the layoffs of 200 temporary employees.

    Versace, an independent Italian house, is currently in a state of turmoil, announcing that revenues fell 13 percent in the first quarter of the year. The board of directors this week approved a three-year plan to steer the company through the economic crisis, while continuing to deny rumors that its chief executive of four years, Giancarlo Di Risio, will soon exit the company.

    The lessons seem to be that it is now difficult to survive in high fashion without being part of a corporate group with recourse to investment for product development and flagship stores, and that the pyramid model is no longer viable.

    The modern strategy, as exemplified by the growth of the Giorgio Armani brand, is a sunburst, with the designer at the epicenter and all product categories (except sunglasses, which are technically demanding) under the brand control.

    Yet, significantly, an Armani Privé couture line was created to add prestige and a direct link with celebrity clients.

    The loss of Christian Lacroix to Paris haute couture is immeasurable. Although the designer hopes to hold a small presentation during the July couture season, this was the last house established under the formal couture rules. Even a restructuring would likely have severe implications on his 125-member staff.

    The grandeur and artistry of the couturier’s work was displayed earlier this month in the sumptuous gown created for Philomèna de Tornos, the bride of Jean de France, Duc de Vendôme, a descendent of the French royal dynasty.

    But just as royalty now has less attention than celebrity, so couture has lost its unique prestige, with the word bandied about by any high-end designer. And whereas fragrances produced from the mystique of haute couture once kept the houses afloat, now it is just as likely that a hip jeans brand like Diesel or a celebrity like Jennifer Lopez will have the perfume hit that has stubbornly eluded Lacroix. Mr. Lacroix, who received the Chevalier de la Legion d’Honneur in 2002, for services to fashion, has other strings to his bow, apart from his colorful and sophisticated collections. He was creative director for Emilio Pucci, the Italian fashion house, from 2002 to 2005, while he was still within the LVMH group.

    The designer also has his own XCLX company, for which he has created decor for the French TGV high-speed train, as well as hotel interiors and uniforms for Air France. He has also designed for theater, opera and dance and acted as curator for fashion exhibits, including one currently at the National Museum of Singapore.
    I'm still trying to figure out who his customer is.
  • Johnny
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2006
    • 1923

    #2
    Thanks Kodiak, very interesting. I have never understood Lacroix. A very talented man, but who couldn't really chanel (har har) it in the right way.

    Also, "Falic brothers"....lulz.

    Comment

    • justine
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2007
      • 672

      #3
      Originally posted by KodakII View Post
      I'm still trying to figure out who his customer is.

      Comment

      • KodakII
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2008
        • 388

        #4
        Originally posted by Johnny View Post
        Thanks Kodiak, very interesting. I have never understood Lacroix. A very talented man, but who couldn't really chanel (har har) it in the right way.

        Also, "Falic brothers"....lulz.
        i'm going to cry.

        Comment

        • Johnny
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2006
          • 1923

          #5
          sorry. that photo is v funny

          Comment

          • sound&vision
            Member
            • May 2008
            • 55

            #6
            It's not surprising, unlike many of the other houses that do couture, they don't have the massive volumes in branded accessories and shoes to keep themselves afloat.

            Comment

            • jcotteri
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2008
              • 1328

              #7
              that photo is very hilarious and one of the only reasons why i still frequent sufu.. Love that humour
              WTB: This

              Comment

              • Faust
                kitsch killer
                • Sep 2006
                • 37849

                #8
                Excellent Article from WSJ.

                The Fall of Christian Lacroix

                After many clashes and 11 CEOs, a famed designer goes bust


                By MAX COLCHESTER

                PARIS—Christian Lacroix sat on a beige sofa in his Parisian atelier nibbling a pink macaroon as a lone client tried on one of his black pleated dresses.
                The large ochre-colored room in which he created 22 years worth of high fashion was mostly empty. The seamstresses had left to go on holiday. They may not have jobs to return to in September.

                Christian Lacroix’s Couture Through the Years


                View Slideshow

                “Perhaps I shouldn’t have been influenced by the idea that my name could be spread across the entire world,” the designer said, running his hand through his closely cropped hair before aiming a taut smile at his client. “You need ego but mine is not blinding.”
                It has been a long fall from grace for Mr. Lacroix. In 1987 the former art student stormed Paris’s staid haute couture scene with his warm colors and Mediterranean flair. Now after more than two decades of losses the brand filed for bankruptcy protection in May. Two potential buyers are being lined up, but as things stand the 58-year old once hailed by critics as savior of haute couture can no longer design clothes under his own name.
                Like many fashion designers before him, Mr. Lacroix’s desire to be an artist hampered his brand’s development. Of the 11 chief executives that Mr. Lacroix worked with, not one managed to reconcile his creative ambition with a profitable model. “A dress is not a sculpture, it is a business,” says Jean-Jacques Picart, a consultant and Mr. Lacroix’s former business partner.
                In an era of publicly-traded conglomerates, the business-end of the equation has never been more pressing. Christian Lacroix was to be the first and last time powerhouse LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton S.A. would attempt to create a fashion house from scratch.


                As a boy growing up in the town of Arles in southern France Mr Lacroix never dreamt of fashion. At schools his teachers gave him dolls to play with while sheltering him from the midday sun. “I didn’t like the touch of their clothes,” Mr. Lacroix said. He wanted to illustrate books.
                However in the early 1980s Mr. Picart found Mr. Lacroix a job as a designer at the fashion house Jean Patou, which nurtured top designers like Karl Lagerfeld and Jean-Paul Gaultier. He swiftly caught the eye of Bernard Arnault , a then-aspiring tycoon who is now chief executive of LVMH. Mr. Arnault’s strategy was to harness Mr. Lacroix’s reputation for making upscale clothes to sell more affordable products. Mr. Lacroix sold the rights to his name and became the brand’s creative director.
                In 1987 the first Christian Lacroix couture show, which featured bubble dresses and bright colors inspired by his native southern France, received raves. “He brought a bit of sunshine to the Parisian catwalk,” says Olivier Saillard, a fashion historian and curator at the Musée des Arts Décoratifs in Paris. But the brand lacked world-wide recognition, and a global perfume launch in 1988 was a flop.
                Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde

                StyleZeitgeist Magazine

                Comment

                • Faust
                  kitsch killer
                  • Sep 2006
                  • 37849

                  #9
                  Part II

                  The perfume debacle set the tone for the next decade. Mr. Lacroix had wanted the perfume bottle to be in the shape of a flat stone with a branch of coral; the end result was a bottle shaped like a heart with what looked like an artery sticking out of the top. “It was disgusting,” says Mr. Lacroix. “The newspapers wrote that I was a maniac and sadist.”
                  Mr. Lacroix felt that LVMH was pushing his image down-market, picking the wrong people to make his ready-to-wear clothes and peddling a cheap Christian Lacroix hair dye. Mr. Picart says Mr. Lacroix made little effort to translate his vision to more wearable, sellable clothing. “He refused to play the game,” he says. When Mr. Picart argued that LVMH needed full control of the house to ensure the business’s success, Mr. Lacroix felt betrayed. In 1999 Mr. Picart left. LVMH declined to comment.
                  In 2005 LVMH sold Christian Lacroix to the Falic group, a U.S duty-free store operator that pledged to take the brand up market. “I thought at last my life would start,” says Mr. Lacroix. Despite the shift, the expensive clothes didn’t sell well, says Nicolas Topiol, Christian Lacroix’s current chief executive. Struggling to make payments, the Falic group shopped the brand but a buyer never emerged; by 2008 Christian Lacroix made a $14.1 million (€10 million) loss for $42.5 million (€30 million) of sales. The company filed for bankruptcy the following May, having invested $57.1 million (€40 million) in the brand.
                  Mr. Lacroix says the Falics weren’t willing to put enough money into the company. Mr. Topiol says the fact that Mr. Lacroix went through 11 chief executives suggests the designer was a source of problems. “When a pattern reproduces itself at length I think you can draw your own conclusions,” Mr. Topiol says.
                  In July a couture show, a stripped-down compilation of black skirts and navy dresses, was cobbled together with the help of donations from friends and admirers. Onlookers wept as the final couture gown swept past and his staff unfurled a banner which read “Lacroix forever.”
                  A week later the French Minister of Culture described the demise of Christian Lacroix as a “cultural disaster.” Four bidders have made offers for the brand. So far the Italian Borletti Group, which is associated with the Rinascente department store and Mr. Lacroix himself, is favored by the judicial administrator. A final decision comes in September.
                  Sitting in the showroom surrounded by boxes stuffed with unsold dresses, Laure du Pavillon, a colleague for 23 years, struggles to come to terms with the potential collapse. “It is a huge waste,” she says. “He doesn’t deserve this.”
                  Mr. Lacroix is sanguine. “Maybe we need something modest,” he says. “Something which makes a profit.”
                  Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde

                  StyleZeitgeist Magazine

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  😀
                  🥰
                  🤢
                  😎
                  😡
                  👍
                  👎