What are you wearing today?

[DRRRK]

What have you done lady... Or, strecheroo, you started it!

[DRRRK]

STT, a discussion can be very interesting and entertaining. I enjoyed reading most of it and learned some things I did not know before. But quoting one study or research after another is no discussion and will lead to nowhere. The last page of this thread is just boring including my own post with the same picture of that woman.

[SuperTurboTaco]

I hear ya, removing post. Don`t know why I got involved anyway.

[rider]

You have come to the conclusion that freud did when he "discovered" the super ego.

Thats why I liked Martin Margiela so much, he stripped away all these social constructs and just experimented with shapes and proportions and see is it visually appealing. No marketing, magazines, brand/look/style tribalism, social definitions of beauty or even if it would sell. Just ideas, process and see what things look like at the end.

now thats pure sex.

[marco-von]

pure sex for me is when i am with a woman, naked and excessive sweating from pure anxiety.....usually have MA+ boxers on my head to keep in tune with my personal style.

thing is these blow up women don't speak much =(

[Fade to Black]

they say sex with a blowup doll isn't good...well I say you have to make it good! Create the occasion for your doll to rise to the challenge!

If worst comes to worst, just imagine you're banging a dead body. Fill 'er up, Sailor!

[stretcheroo]

What have you done lady... Or, strecheroo, you started it!

Sorry. I liked the picture, I liked the girl. that simple.

[DRRRK]

^I wasn't serious. It just evolved.

[stretcheroo]

^ I know. Unintended consequences. Interesting discussion however. But I too vote for more WAYWT shots.

[Fuuma]

Why not? Tell her you love her and that monogamous relationship are a social construct. The same as why we like drop crotch trousers over FUBU jeans :)

I'll stop now. Please post clothes.

Why do you instantly assume social constructs can be instantly rejected with no consequences or that you have no compulsion to conform to them?

[Magician]

That girl in the Sartorialist photo is really cute and confident-looking.



Dickshadow
S2A
H&M
F&B

[Mail-Moth]

Sorry to interrupt.



As for the discussion above, I must admit that I hardly understand the point. Wether sexual orientations, desire for multiple partners, etc., are conditioned by genes, or induced by personal history and social background, or by all of those factors, it won't change the fact that those who experiment those inclinations have to deal with them, along with the way they are perceived by others.

I don't see how demonstrating that they root in nature makes them more or less acceptable in a given community - since arguments of that kind are generally borrowed to scientific works, which do not reach religious fundamentalists, for very obvious reasons.

Nor do I see why they should be seen as mere "social diseases" - acquired and therefore curable - if the contrary had to be demonstrated. It is not because an inclination comes from one's experience as a social being that it has to be considered as less weighty in one's psychism. Sometimes I have this feeling that people need to stick to that old metaphysic according to which everything that don't proceed from some non-human sphere - wether it be God or nature - is somewhat devoid of legitimity.

[endorphinz]

The prettiest girls on first sight get boring the fastest.

For every beautiful woman in the world, there’s a guy who’s tired of fucking her.

Sorry. I liked the picture, I liked the girl. that simple.

Why do you have to go and make things so complicated?

.....

[zamb]

MailMoth,
I like this look, tell us more about the pieces...
is this another of Adeline's pants?

[Mail-Moth]

Yes, Zamb, these are the last ones. I'm wearing them non-stop since last saturday !

For the rest : YY cardigan, Ann D basic shirt, Alden boots.