Regarding, Camus; The Stranger as a popular novel on existentialism has a similar fault, to countless other works misunderstood by novices, on the matter.
For example...
- Kobo Abe 'Woman In The Dunes' [Book / Film]
And to some extent...
- Antonioni 'Blow up'
The fault is, these works superficially or graphically illustrate the concept of existentialism through actions or scenarios as oppose to profound: Dialogue or philosophical discourse.
So you have to be acquainted with: Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Sartre... As philosophical icons to understand why such a simple novel or film is so effective.
I suggest you watch Godards' "Breathless" which is more coherent as a quality narrative.
And, if the basic, dumbed-down, implication that life is pointless and everyone lives the same life; Where only the details change, does not appeal to you...
Existentialism is not for you.
For example...
- Kobo Abe 'Woman In The Dunes' [Book / Film]
And to some extent...
- Antonioni 'Blow up'
The fault is, these works superficially or graphically illustrate the concept of existentialism through actions or scenarios as oppose to profound: Dialogue or philosophical discourse.
So you have to be acquainted with: Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Sartre... As philosophical icons to understand why such a simple novel or film is so effective.
I suggest you watch Godards' "Breathless" which is more coherent as a quality narrative.
And, if the basic, dumbed-down, implication that life is pointless and everyone lives the same life; Where only the details change, does not appeal to you...
Existentialism is not for you.
Comment