Re: Photography is truth. The cinema is truth twenty-four times per second: The cinema thread
[quote user="mass"]i really love bresson... i love mouchette, although to be honest it took me a few tries before i could get through all of diary of a country priest in one sitting... i watched the departed last week... kind of dissapointed because i thought it started off extremely well. nobody agrees with me that harvey keitel would've played the part better than jack nicholson, either. looking forward to borat soon...[/quote]</p>
<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">I think the two adaptation of Bernanos novels I saw (diary of a country priest-Bresson and Under the sun ofSatan-Pialat)were pretty amazing in the depth with which they explored the meaning of faith, especially how their Christ-like characters were unsuited (too pure?)to daily life as members of small, rural communities. It's interesting to note that Pialat was definitely a non-believer, contrary to Bresson, which didn't stop him from making a deeply mystical film. He, of course, mixed it with his usual brand of conflicted characters all fragility and defiance clashing against each others in extreme contexts (death, love, suicide, etc.) but stayed away from his typical naturalism for amore literary style that made me think, in a way, of Bresson's direction (with emotion addedin the mix...).</span></p>
<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">I saw the Departed and actually enjoyed the movie. The story is pretty much the same as Infernal Affairs but the treatment is what makes it different, IA is a sleek, modern, tightly editedthriller all steely blues and greys set in the "high rise jungle" not a well made cop/gangster drama with interesting characterizations, a 70s editing style (no MTV for you!!) and a good depiction of Boston slums and urban decay. DiCaprio is certainly not a great actor and almost unbelievable as any form of tough guy but I guess Scorsese's talent made me forget that a little. As for Damon he can only play a clean-cut, up and coming preppy young man and thankfully that's what the role entailed, which means his small range didn’t work against the movie. The supporting roles were all good example of traditional Hollywood character acting and I thoroughly enjoyed that. FinallyI'm sure lots of viewers kept seeing Keitel or DeNiro in the Nicholson role but he was doing an appropriate job, mixing some low key acting with his typical over the top fare.</span></p>
</p>
[quote user="mass"]i really love bresson... i love mouchette, although to be honest it took me a few tries before i could get through all of diary of a country priest in one sitting... i watched the departed last week... kind of dissapointed because i thought it started off extremely well. nobody agrees with me that harvey keitel would've played the part better than jack nicholson, either. looking forward to borat soon...[/quote]</p>
<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">I think the two adaptation of Bernanos novels I saw (diary of a country priest-Bresson and Under the sun ofSatan-Pialat)were pretty amazing in the depth with which they explored the meaning of faith, especially how their Christ-like characters were unsuited (too pure?)to daily life as members of small, rural communities. It's interesting to note that Pialat was definitely a non-believer, contrary to Bresson, which didn't stop him from making a deeply mystical film. He, of course, mixed it with his usual brand of conflicted characters all fragility and defiance clashing against each others in extreme contexts (death, love, suicide, etc.) but stayed away from his typical naturalism for amore literary style that made me think, in a way, of Bresson's direction (with emotion addedin the mix...).</span></p>
<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">I saw the Departed and actually enjoyed the movie. The story is pretty much the same as Infernal Affairs but the treatment is what makes it different, IA is a sleek, modern, tightly editedthriller all steely blues and greys set in the "high rise jungle" not a well made cop/gangster drama with interesting characterizations, a 70s editing style (no MTV for you!!) and a good depiction of Boston slums and urban decay. DiCaprio is certainly not a great actor and almost unbelievable as any form of tough guy but I guess Scorsese's talent made me forget that a little. As for Damon he can only play a clean-cut, up and coming preppy young man and thankfully that's what the role entailed, which means his small range didn’t work against the movie. The supporting roles were all good example of traditional Hollywood character acting and I thoroughly enjoyed that. FinallyI'm sure lots of viewers kept seeing Keitel or DeNiro in the Nicholson role but he was doing an appropriate job, mixing some low key acting with his typical over the top fare.</span></p>
</p>
Comment