next level diagram = ratio comparison
miserableman, you're mixing different things.
- On the high neck long coat, which is a complete different shape from the blazers/overcoats, sleeves were notably short (and shorter in 2009 than in the 2010, where they have again the regular long lenght).
- I could proove you that, in a same collection, different type of blazers (in the same size of course), worn by the same model, have different lenght of sleeves, but secret material has to be kept secret.![Ninja](https://www.stylezeitgeist.com/forums/core/images/smilies/ninja.gif)
So, I'll choose another way.
This coat is from FW 2008 :
On this one, the shoulder widht/sleeve lenght is 0,64.
On this one, from FW 2007, the ratio is 0,60.
But this was only a side remark in my original post, and, like AKA, I'm not sure that this discussion is really leading anywhere...
miserableman, you're mixing different things.
- On the high neck long coat, which is a complete different shape from the blazers/overcoats, sleeves were notably short (and shorter in 2009 than in the 2010, where they have again the regular long lenght).
- I could proove you that, in a same collection, different type of blazers (in the same size of course), worn by the same model, have different lenght of sleeves, but secret material has to be kept secret.
![Ninja](https://www.stylezeitgeist.com/forums/core/images/smilies/ninja.gif)
So, I'll choose another way.
This coat is from FW 2008 :
On this one, the shoulder widht/sleeve lenght is 0,64.
On this one, from FW 2007, the ratio is 0,60.
But this was only a side remark in my original post, and, like AKA, I'm not sure that this discussion is really leading anywhere...
Comment