Originally posted by Faust
View Post
Just because someones says so doesn't make it so. Do we agree on this? Inaccuracies? Language barriers? Maybe, but "disproved" is patently false unless our notions of evidence/confirmation have sunk to a new low.
I'm sure he has some help making the shoes. That being said, most of the rest of the interview seems tame and uncontroversial.
Comment