Originally posted by Verdandi
View Post
in addition to it being the being the biggest fashion blog of the world, i was also referring to what she wrote....
"When it was over, I thought about what a shame it is that they’ll be so difficult to obtain (just looking at Vuitton’s clothes feels expensive) but then I stopped to think that maybe 100 shows deep into the last leg of fashion week, there’s something really impressive to be said about leaving a venue (or locking an iPhone screen) and still feeling excited and impulsive over the prospect of new clothes."
Originally posted by Verdandi
View Post
i agree that the RTW customer does not exist. however, i don't think that is because of marc jacobs' inability to design 'covetable' clothing - he very clearly has managed to do that with his own lines historically - it is because that was never his job at vuitton.
if you look at the business model of vuitton, it is not a fashion brand. it is an enormous global business based around DOS and airport retail of bags and small leather goods. the logic of this business is completely different from that of a RTW brand. for instance, vuitton never do sales, and they sell a huge amount of 'masstige' products to customers who save up to buy ONE piece, or to people who work in very conservative environments and cannot wear 'fashion' but can use accessories to add a little accent to their style. these things are all completely contrary to fashion retail logic, and arnault will not change this business model, because it is working absolutely fantastically well.
so, assuming the underlying core business idea will remain the same (selling millions of bags) - what will be the place for avant-guarde fashion within the company? well, it could be like faust says - to provide spectacle to infuse bags with a level of fashion again. let's hope that is the case because then we may see interesting design from ghesquière - but i don't think that spectacle will ever be necessary to achieve the goals for this move. and if it is not necessary, it will not be allowed.
vuitton have lately had significant problems with what is known as 'brand fatigue' in their biggest markets. they were so early going into china, and did it on such a massive scale, that the chinese customer now wants to move on to more sophisticated brands. however, this move of putting ghesquière in charge, automatically adds this flavor of 'sophistication' to the vuitton brand again. it connects the brand 'vuitton' with the brand 'ghesquière' even without him changing anything at all in the vuitton product portfolio or without adding anything new in a RTW line. suddenly, people who have never considered vuitton like yourself, or people who have grown a bit bored with the brand, are thinking it might be time to go into a vuitton store (again) and that it would be OK to be seen with a vuitton product in their hand (again).
if you look at the types of garments sent down the runway, with their relatively safe design but über-luxe materials - i think it makes sense to say that these items will end up in a few select flagship vuitton stores to spice up the retail space and possibly sell to a few HNWI clients. i cannot ever see this RTW line being distributed on a larger scale than that - it just doesn't go with the business model to start seriously investing in a risky seasonality-based RTW business model on a broad scale and even less with a risky avant-guarde design proposition.
what was shown on the catwalk this season you can be absolutely sure has been reviewed in detail and pre-approved by arnault. so you can see it as a clear expression of business strategy: a slight injection of fashion credibility into a very successful conservative luxury brand, in order to safeguard the existing core markets.
but lets hope ghesquière at least gets to go a bit more avant-garde within the given constraints as time progresses. unfortunately vuitton has been built as a global symbol of bourgeoisie (and very, very profitable as such) not a symbol of experimentation or daring, so i doubt we will see his any of his best work here.
Comment