Re: Patrik Ervell F/W 07
[quote user="nqth"]
In a retail point of view, a big store would stock everthing that would sell. They have a broad spectrum of clients.
A smaller store would have different ways of doing bussiness. They might stock only "their" designers to "their" clients. Aloharag would not be a good example to look at. They sell a lot to Japan customers I guess. And a lot of Japanese boys out there buy big brands, DG, DS and such.
Someone might like MMM and DS alike (although I haven't met him yet), but he might just like it like it this, without knowing all MMM philosophy and such. You can't just say that a guy buy sth from some designers would make them "equal", in term of design, creativity and the role the designers are playing in fashion.
[/quote]
[quote user="nqth"]
In a retail point of view, a big store would stock everthing that would sell. They have a broad spectrum of clients.
A smaller store would have different ways of doing bussiness. They might stock only "their" designers to "their" clients. Aloharag would not be a good example to look at. They sell a lot to Japan customers I guess. And a lot of Japanese boys out there buy big brands, DG, DS and such.
Someone might like MMM and DS alike (although I haven't met him yet), but he might just like it like it this, without knowing all MMM philosophy and such. You can't just say that a guy buy sth from some designers would make them "equal", in term of design, creativity and the role the designers are playing in fashion.
[/quote]
I never called them equal, I merely said in retail they are indistinguishable, and I cited my examples. Don't put words in my mouth.
And I did not reduce menswear into that basic formula, if you read my posts you would know that I covered a lot more depth than that. Again, please don't put words in my mouth.
Comment