Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WTF

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Law
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2013
    • 513

    Originally posted by Faust View Post
    Would have to be custom-made, cause she's a bit big, no?
    It would have to be pretty big to fit her and all her lies.

    Comment

    • Fuuma
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2006
      • 4050

      Originally posted by Fenix View Post
      Absolutely, however, content drives discussion among Millennials. They interact differently and want to be engaged differently than GenXer's.

      We are the old people.
      Millennials don't exist aside from being born between date x and date y, generational theory is bullshit.
      Selling CCP, Harnden, Raf, Rick etc.
      http://www.stylezeitgeist.com/forums...me-other-stuff

      Comment

      • Arkady
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2011
        • 953

        No it's not. Perceived membership and beliefs & behaviors can be arbitrarily defined but age location in history cannot. Turnings are identified based on age location in history relative to historical incidents the American body politic deems to be points of upheaval.

        Individuals age 1-18 would clearly have a different perception of a major war than individuals 18-85 -- that defines both perceived membership and some aspects of beliefs & behaviors.

        The point of generational theory is to show how we engage in collective historiography and how that process feeds back into the memetic components of our culture. It may not be accurate in a 'vibes, namaste' or bored French psychoanalytic context and it probably shouldn't be used to define specific generations as broad swaths of assholes but historical cyclicity is pretty hard to deny on a demographic level.
        Last edited by Arkady; 02-24-2016, 10:52 AM.

        Comment

        • fr_gmnt
          Junior Member
          • Dec 2015
          • 6

          this ecommerce venture blatantly making fakes of just about every designer good ever posted on social media (even aitor skull bags somehow) has a classifieds section for authentic pieces

          Comment

          • patR
            Junior Member
            • Apr 2015
            • 25

            $325 for that awful DHL shirt by Vetements on antonioli.

            I hope that whoever is dumb enough to buy it has DHL deliver it to them...

            Only to find out that DHL is demanding they pay $100+ in import & brokerage fees.

            Comment

            • the breaks
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2007
              • 1543

              Anyone else think this just looks really cheap? I mean look at the zippers...

              Suede is too Gucci.

              Comment

              • Nickefuge
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2014
                • 860

                How come Vêtements are allowed to use DHL’s logo?
                "The only rule is don't be boring and dress cute wherever you go. Life is too short to blend in."
                -Paris Hilton

                Comment

                • Faust
                  kitsch killer
                  • Sep 2006
                  • 37849

                  Originally posted by Nickefuge View Post
                  How come Vêtements are allowed to use DHL’s logo?
                  Supposedly they were sponsored by Georgian DHL. Not sure if it's true.
                  Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde

                  StyleZeitgeist Magazine

                  Comment

                  • Arkady
                    Senior Member
                    • Apr 2011
                    • 953

                    Originally posted by Nickefuge View Post
                    How come Vêtements are allowed to use DHL’s logo?
                    Parody law, I believe.

                    Comment

                    • gregor
                      Senior Member
                      • Oct 2014
                      • 603

                      i think it's probably because it passes as art (if so, art has an even looser definition than i thought), which would allow them to use it and even make money off it. nadia plesner used the louis logo a few years back and sold her art on shirts that made money (albeit for a charity), and lvmh sued her for it. art in general has had a history of appropriating corporate trademarks and making money of it, even when the trademarks are probably presented in a less than stellar light. everyone from warhol to aqua got away with it.

                      i don't know if it comes under the sc definition of parody, but it's definitely somewhere in the giant mess of fair use laws that the us uses.

                      Comment

                      • Arkady
                        Senior Member
                        • Apr 2011
                        • 953

                        Yeah that's exactly it -- it's cemented more if the logo is somehow altered or derived in order to communicate a "spirit of satire."

                        Comment

                        • gregor
                          Senior Member
                          • Oct 2014
                          • 603

                          i place vetements on the same tier as those "aint laurent without yves" type parody tees, so maybe that'd work as well.

                          Comment

                          • eleves
                            Senior Member
                            • Sep 2012
                            • 524

                            The fact that the designers behind Vetements can willingly create bullshit and expect it to sell in the first place is a problem in itself (way before the fact that people buy into it) On another note: Nathan For You is probably the funniest, fucked-up show that I've seen
                            Originally posted by Faust
                            HOBBY?! HOBBY?!?!?!?!?! You are on SZ, buddy - it ain't no hobby, it's passion, religion, and unbounded cosmic love rolled into one.

                            Comment

                            • gregor
                              Senior Member
                              • Oct 2014
                              • 603

                              Originally posted by eleves View Post
                              On another note: Nathan For You is probably the funniest, fucked-up show that I've seen
                              second the first sentiment, but especially have to second this i'm not a huge fan of a lot of new comedy but nathan's character is brilliant.

                              Comment

                              • unwashed
                                Senior Member
                                • Dec 2008
                                • 694

                                Originally posted by Arkady View Post
                                Yeah that's exactly it -- it's cemented more if the logo is somehow altered or derived in order to communicate a "spirit of satire."
                                But didn't Nike make Rick Owens stop his dunk production because of a derived logo? And didn't Rick stated in interviews he produced these sneakers as a satire on Nike, Puma and Adidas? So he actually didn't needed to stop his production and could win a trial if it came that far?

                                Also regarding vetements, complete the look
                                Grailed link

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X
                                😀
                                🥰
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎