Originally posted by Faust
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
WTF
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Faust View Post/\ foul. is it the buddhist way though? cause the nazis inverted it.Originally posted by Mewtu View Postno, it's the nazi one.
Still, I can't imagine anyone wearing it. Although in Japan it seems like these sorts of things don't matter as much. Judging from what seems to be fairly acceptable subcultures, I'd think they have their own ideas of "kitsch" irony...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by AKA*NYC View Post^ must be the japanese balmainSelling CCP, Harnden, Raf, Rick etc.
http://www.stylezeitgeist.com/forums...me-other-stuff
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by lotek01 View PostNot quite, both types were used in Eastern religions. The nazis didn't flip it, they just used that one which changed the meaning of that particular orientation forever.
Still, I can't imagine anyone wearing it. Although in Japan it seems like these sorts of things don't matter as much. Judging from what seems to be fairly acceptable subcultures, I'd think they have their own ideas of "kitsch" irony...Selling CCP, Harnden, Raf, Rick etc.
http://www.stylezeitgeist.com/forums...me-other-stuff
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Johnny View Postaaaaaaaaaarghhhhhhhhhhh not kitsch and irony please no........Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde
StyleZeitgeist Magazine
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Fuuma View PostThe swastika was used in Iran, by American Indians, etc. It's a pretty common symbol and you could still see it on cheap trinkets in the US during the 30s. However I'd say it has been sufficiently recontextualized that I'd avoid using it on fashion items. I remember reading a debate about how the Japanese were courageously using post-modern remixing to remove swastikas from the Nazi context and make it something else, which is bullshit; they're just ignorant dumbasses (in that specific case) not critical theorists of negative-democracy discourse in the post WWII age.Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde
StyleZeitgeist Magazine
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Heirloom View Postit would be illegal to wear it in sweden.
germany on the other hand has much stronger laws against symbols from the naziperiod. but thats something they just "had" to do in the aftermath of the war.
Comment
-
-
no matter what, one would just be either obnoxious or ignorant to wear that shirt at all.www.AlbertHuangMD.com - Digital Portfolio Of Projects & Designs
Merz (5/22/09):"i'm a firm believer that the ultimate prevailing logic in design is 'does shit look sick as fuck' "
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Chinorlz View Postno matter what, one would just be either obnoxious or ignorant to wear that shirt at all.Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde
StyleZeitgeist Magazine
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Fuuma View PostThe swastika was used in Iran, by American Indians, etc. It's a pretty common symbol and you could still see it on cheap trinkets in the US during the 30s. However I'd say it has been sufficiently recontextualized that I'd avoid using it on fashion items. I remember reading a debate about how the Japanese were courageously using post-modern remixing to remove swastikas from the Nazi context and make it something else, which is bullshit; they're just ignorant dumbasses (in that specific case) not critical theorists of negative-democracy discourse in the post WWII age.WTB: This
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by AKA*NYC View Post^ must be the japanese balmain
rubber sandals with an exclusive skull application goin for €650 instead of 6.50 at gap, what a bargain, what better way to show how rich and stylish you are -.-And through their parting lids there came and went
Keen glimpses of the inner firmament
Comment
-
Comment