I wear the ribbed tanks as layering pieces, but the long sleeves are not kind. Only for those with under 10% body fat IMHO.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sizing help
Collapse
X
-
I own a ss12 naska silk/viscose tee, cotton tank and a fw10 gleam ribbed long sleeve. All size small, all fit TTS. The silk/viscose tee was tight at first but stretches out and I think I probably coudlve swung an XS. I like it tighter than its shown on LVR though, the bottom stacks nicely at my waist instead of falling mid thigh
Comment
-
-
ss13 drkshdw measurements shorts/pants
Originally posted by lowrey View PostThis isn't so much a question as it is an observation.. but has anyone else noticed that the sizing on this seasons DRKSHDW drop crotch / pod shorts is very strange?
I've tried two pairs, the heavier and lighter jersey, both in size S, and they were gigantic. I'm a 50/L, and I was swimming in these. The length is obviously supposed to be long and baggy, but even the waist was huge, the S would easily stretch to fit a 52/XL. The S pretty much looked like the modeled ones here, which according to LN-CC are an L on a guy my size.
Do they just make the same ones and tag different sizes for fun or what?
I tried the mainline pod shorts, and while they fit big as well, at least there is a difference between sizes. as a 50 I was able to fit 46, 48 was already roomy and 50 was too big and kind of lost the cool silhouette.Originally posted by Dane View Postthe drkshdw pants on ssense are from last season I think, because they haven't received their ss shipment yet, and only one size remains, which leads me to that assumption....so I wouldn't go by those measurements.
maybe send ln-cc an email, they're very helpful.
I finally have the answer from LNCC for the measurements.... they do seem a bit large.... I'm generally size M in drksdhw but for the pod shorts here I would go for an S :
my waist circumference is 95cm (wich for shorts-pants translates into 47,5 cm laying flat; but for stretchable with drawstring, I'd go for something around 10-11 cm smaller which is the case of size S, which should be 38 cm laying flat)
Rick Owens DRKSHDW Men's Fine Jersey Pod Shorts - http://www.ln-cc.com/invt/drk0112005blk#content
Large: Waist 82cm/ 32.50" - Hem 52cm/ 20.50" - Inside Leg 5cm/ 2.00" - Rice 38cm/15.00"
Medium: Waist 80cm/ 31.50" - Hem 51cm/ 20.00" - Inside Leg 5cm/ 2.00" - Rise 33cm/13.00"
Small: Waist 76cm/ 30.00" - Hem 48cm/ 19.00" - Inside Leg 5cm/ 2.00" - Rise 32cm/ 12.50"
Measurements for jersey pants: (I'd go for an M)
Rick Owens DRKSHDW Men's Jersey Pants - http://www.ln-cc.com/invt/drk0112002blk/
Large: Waist 82cm/ 32.50" - Hem 40cm/ 16.00" - Inside Leg 89cm/ 35.00" - Rise 29cm/11.50"
Medium: Waist 78cm/ 30.50" - Hem 38cm/ 15.00" - Inside Leg 89cm/ 35.00" - Rise 27cm/10.50"
hope it helps !!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dane View PostI probably don't have your body, so I like a bit of breathing room. Does the silk/viscose go back to the original size after you wash it?Originally posted by DRRRKThe bridge from Dior to CCP being Rick Owens.
Comment
-
-
I am curious if anyone here can shed any light on details as to how Individual Sentiments sizing has changed, if at all, over the few seasons it has been around - i.e. would a size 1 from 2009 have a similar fit to a size 1 from 2013? Any insight would be appreciated, thanks!
Comment
-
-
from my experience, there hasn't been any drastic changes one way or the other."AVANT GUARDE HIGHEST FASHION. NOW NOW this is it people, these are the brands no one fucking knows and people are like WTF. they do everything by hand in their freaking secret basement and shit."
STYLEZEITGEIST MAGAZINE | BLOG
Comment
-
Comment