Who's the fucker who dares to interrupt our discussion by posting a pic ?
Oh, it's you Fark.
I quite like it.
This is BSR's definition of formality.
In addition, the shoes we are speaking about have nothing to do with any events of "rural life".
Again, cloggs are out of subject : none of the designers we're interested in designs any. (waiting for a pic to pop up)
You maybe want me to say that shoes have to be made of another fabric than wood to be formal ? Maybe.
The example of the galoches de guéret is interesting since I said that formal = fixed form. And this form can vary, but inside of a certain frame (celle du territoire, et de sa déterritorialisation). I never said that heels were enough, I said last form + sides + elevation. Les galoches de guéret are the frame.
Mail-Moth's reply : "Please define more precisely the idea of frame".
Oh, it's you Fark.
I quite like it.
Originally posted by Mail-Moth
View Post
In addition, the shoes we are speaking about have nothing to do with any events of "rural life".
Again, cloggs are out of subject : none of the designers we're interested in designs any. (waiting for a pic to pop up)
You maybe want me to say that shoes have to be made of another fabric than wood to be formal ? Maybe.
The example of the galoches de guéret is interesting since I said that formal = fixed form. And this form can vary, but inside of a certain frame (celle du territoire, et de sa déterritorialisation). I never said that heels were enough, I said last form + sides + elevation. Les galoches de guéret are the frame.
Mail-Moth's reply : "Please define more precisely the idea of frame".
Comment