What are you wearing today?

[misterpale]

Re: What are you wearing today?

ah....i was wondering....

[sbw4224]

Re: What are you wearing today?


CDG
Uniqlo
Uniqlo
Clarks

[what_counts]

Re: What are you wearing today?



[quote user="cpaik"]

ann d t shirt
ro long sleeve
nicolo berrini hooded henley
ccp belt
dior
unbranded vans[/quote]</p>

this isn't bad but for all the money you spent on other pieces I think you should get some new footwear</p>

not hating on vans its just a suggestion </p>

[Chinorlz]

Re: What are you wearing today?



^ I dunno... I think they work in this case. Sometimes simple nondescript kicks are where its at you know?</p>

I'm sure a lot of people on this forum have a pair of chucks :) I know I do!</p>

[cpaik]

Re: What are you wearing today?

[quote user="what_counts"]

this isn't bad but for all the money you spent on other pieces I think you should get some new footwear</p>

not hating on vans its just a suggestion</p>

[/quote]</p>

I own expensive footwear, but my goal wasn't to wear very expensive clothing, it was to achieve a look. It just so happened that the look involved plain white plimsoll-esque shoes and I wore vans.
</p>

[mesh]

Re: What are you wearing today?

I'm going to have to agree with wc, the vans ruin the look. At least would have been loads better with chucks though not a huge fan of them either.

[cpaik]

Re: What are you wearing today?

Are you guys objecting to the aesthetic of the shoe, or the brand of the shoe? Or perhaps both? I can understand and respect if you dislike the look/shape of the shoe, but if you're nay-saying the vans on the grounds that they are vans, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I'd be curious to find out if the same picture would have elicited a different response had I said they were generic plimsolls, or common projects.

[KeijiHaino]

Re: What are you wearing today?

they look like keds.....maybe....black...chuckss? hitops? something?

[Johnny]

Re: What are you wearing today?

[quote user="wire.artist"][quote user="Faust"][quote user="Avantster"]


yes, airboyair, do post here more often [Y]</P>


Matt, HK summer is just so humid, I don't know how you manage. I've been back there twice this year, we should do a meet next time.</P>


I've got to get less lazy and post a few YY outfits and prove Johnny wrong :-)
</P>


[/quote]</P>


do it!</P>


[/quote]</P>


+1, Johnny is wrong hehe[66]
</P>[/quote]


eminently possible.</P>

[Yan]

Re: What are you wearing today?



[quote user="cpaik"]Are you guys objecting to the aesthetic of the shoe, or the brand of the shoe? Or perhaps both? I can understand and respect if you dislike the look/shape of the shoe, but if you're nay-saying the vans on the grounds that they are vans, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I'd be curious to find out if the same picture would have elicited a different response had I said they were generic plimsolls, or common projects.
[/quote]</p>

Very good point. Discuss....... </p>

[matthewhk]

Re: What are you wearing today?

regardless of brand i don't think that particular shoe is working with the whole thing...i don't have any ideas on what shoe would work better, but to my eyes those ain't it. I like Vans, don't wear em but i like seein em with the right outfit.

[Faust]

Re: What are you wearing today?

i just don't like sneakers/keds/whatever (unless i am playing sports or in the gym), ESPECIALLY white - so I'm the critics here.

[voltaire's anti-defamation league]

Re: What are you wearing today?

mike lowery used to sometimes rock similar vans or the exact same ones last year with his all ann d ensembles in some of his waywt's and i didn't think they worked especially well either. i think it might be a bit of both aesthetic and brand association...it lumps u in with the sufu san fran asain dork/hipster loser white keds crowd by default ....but ultimately just the shape of the shoe (especially in that picture) leaves something to be desired....they look so narrow and little and feminine...i think it's one of those cases where the small little deatils make a great deal of difference u can say white converse or common projects r the exact same but i think white converse or the ann d sneakers would be a slight improvement or RO trainers or something with a bit more umph...those vans just dont balance out very well theyre too little.

[Faust]

Re: What are you wearing today?



[quote user="voltaire's anti-defamation league"]mike lowery used to sometimes rock similar vans or the exact same ones last year with his all ann d ensembles in some of his waywt's and i didn't think they worked especially well either. i think it might be a bit of both aesthetic and brand association...it lumps u in with the sufu san fran asain dork/hipster loser white keds crowd by default ....but ultimately just the shape of the shoe (especially in that picture) leaves something to be desired....they look so narrow and little and feminine...i think it's one of those cases where the small little deatils make a great deal of difference u can say white converse or common projects r the exact same but i think white converse or the ann d sneakers would be a slight improvement or RO trainers or something with a bit more umph...those vans just dont balance out very well theyre too little.
[/quote]</p>

What if they look like this?</p>

</p>

[drexl]

Re: What are you wearing today?

[quote user="Faust"]

What if they look like this?</p>

</p>

[/quote]</p>

Old school Number (N)ine?[66]
</p>