What are you wearing today?

[c.r.e.a.m.]

casius,

those ann d sneaks are sick.

[curiouscharles]

I don't take waywt's ever, but I got busted by stylesightings.com coming out of Seven while in NY with a uniqlo bag in hand (bought undies for myself and jeans for the roommate).



erm..
raf
julius
rick

[edit: i need to get back to new york asap, anybody need a faux-husband?]

[Heirloom]

It's not sexless - it's feminine. Must we have the same argument over and over again?

as long as there's no specific room made for tits or shoulders I consider it androgenous. It's your loss in creativity and diversity if you define it differently, and it's stupid.


casius and curiouscharles: HOT!!!

[Heirloom]

exactly. I dont see anything wrong with calling something too feminine, if it by someones standards and opinion is. I doubt anyone meant it as a curse word. I'm not sure if attacking these kind of comments by calling someone a narrow minded pussy is that much more open minded?

they're saying it looks TOO feminine. the word too implies a certain value that isn't all that favourable in my opinion. If they said it looks feminine i'd be "duh, so what?" but when they're implying it's not to be desired or unstylish, I don't get it.

[Faust]

the two C's, you look great. Interlock you and you get a goth ninja chanel logo.

[curiouscharles]

never though of that - new photoshop project.

[theetruscan]

i think people who dislike duncans outfit for being too feminine are narrowminded pussies. I love the fit. I agree with servo. It's sexless, it's a character, an impression, a mood. Not a gender. It's graphic in nature, and almost not a human body anymore. people should dress like this more often.

For someone who finds offense in so much, you make some amazingly nasty statements.

and your phrasing insinuates that transvestitism is unlikable and bad? are you defending people who think duncan's dressing ugly?

I still have a hard time wrapping my head around what's so ugly and unfashionable about genderbending. It's done ALL the time. you just don't know. pants, suits, all of it, has been adapted by women. why can't men adapt womens wear? the best thing is that it's not even a dress duncan is wearing. It's a new form, that can't immediately be categorized as a sweater or shirt, and all of a sudden when you don't know how to label it it's disturbing you. lazy mindset.

I think it's entirely reasonable to defend people who think duncan's dress is ugly. Fashion, style, and aesthetics aren't absolute. Some people enjoy the appearance and style of what he's wearing, and of genderbending outfits, others don't. Many probably enjoy some level of playing with stereotypes but not more than that. This isn't wrong, it's a different aesthetic. I really think you're creating things to be upset by here.

as long as there's no specific room made for tits or shoulders I consider it androgenous. It's your loss in creativity and diversity if you define it differently, and it's stupid.

Seriously, if anyone who disagrees with you is stupid, you are you speaking to them?

[kira]

oh no, another thread...

[laika]

oh no, another thread...

just ignore it and look at Cas. Hot!

[kira]

just ignore it and look at Cas. Hot!

Good strategy. Hot indeed.

[lowrey]

they're saying it looks TOO feminine. the word too implies a certain value that isn't all that favourable in my opinion. If they said it looks feminine i'd be "duh, so what?" but when they're implying it's not to be desired or unstylish, I don't get it.

I think that "too" just says that its obviously an opinion.. which means that it shouldn't be taken personally or too seriously, you can just say that to you it looks whatever way it does and agree to disagree

Cas and Charles looking hella sharp, hope you both had good trips!

[Fuuma]

as long as there's no specific room made for tits or shoulders I consider it androgenous. It's your loss in creativity and diversity if you define it differently, and it's stupid.


casius and curiouscharles: HOT!!!

I think we've had a similar discussion before but someone who wants to challenge norms and employ signifiers he doesn't understand is not being transgressive he's being ignorant. You can't simply disregard the existence of connotations because you dislike them; admitting they're here is the first step in being able to use them effectively and does not imply you have to follow dogma.

ps: I'm talking about you not Duncan, you're wearing blinders.

[Heirloom]

i'm sorry if i came off as hot tempered. Not my intention. I totally think it's ok to dislike something i like. I just didn't like the reasons why, that's all. I agree to disagree. Mostly I agree with what people in here think anyway. That's why I'm here.

[Fuuma]

oh no, another thread...

Oh my god, we're having a debate instead of just posting outfits or new gears we robo-koped!!! What will become of us!!! C'mon it's nice to have some heated discussions from time to time, just what the doctor ordered for the forum. From disagreements emerge enlightening viewpoints.

[Casius]

Laika & Kira- Thank you, you're making me blush over here!

A few more I just uploaded...


Yohji, Rick leather, Rick tees x 3, drkshdw dual layer jean, rick combatz

And same look from a few posts ago...


:D