Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What are you wearing today?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AKA*NYC
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2007
    • 3007

    i don't think ccp designs with wearability in mind. for the most part his clothes seem most lifelike when hanging on a meathook detached from the human body. as contrived as it sounds i see him as an artist above all else - at least as of 2008.
    LOVE THE SHIRST... HOW much?

    Comment

    • Casius
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2006
      • 4772

      I like to think of Poell as a magnificent wing-ed angel flying out of the concrete colored heavens with an electric guitar made of pig intestines and sinew, singing songs only heard as a whisper.
      "because the young are whores. dealers come to carol to get the rock"

      Comment

      • BECOMING-INTENSE
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2008
        • 1868

        Originally posted by AKA*NYC View Post
        i don't think ccp designs with wearability in mind. for the most part his clothes seem most lifelike when hanging on a meathook detached from the human body. as contrived as it sounds i see him as an artist above all else - at least as of 2008.
        But i do think he designs with bodies in mind, and without a body the tension, rigidity, intensities, restriction, etc. are lost. The rendering of these forces are only there in the relation between the work and the body. I see him as an artist to, but one who needs a body, like the choreographer who needs moving bodies.

        And Tiger, if possible, I would love to see a better picture and details of that outfit, as it's hard to see what you have created, i.e. the suit!

        Ps. I don't think Rick Owens trainers works, period.
        Last edited by BECOMING-INTENSE; 02-04-2009, 11:47 AM.
        Are you afraid of women, Doctor?
        Of course.

        www.becomingmads.com

        Comment

        • Chant
          Banned
          • Jun 2008
          • 2775

          Originally posted by BECOMING-INTENSE View Post
          But i do think he designs with bodies in mind, and without a body the tension, rigidity, intensities, restriction, etc. are lost. The rendering of these forces are only there in the relation between the work and the body. I see him as an artist to, but one who needs a body, like the choreographer who needs moving bodies.
          I like this idea a lot : CCP's clothes need a body like the brodequins need the torture victim's legs.



          Originally posted by Torquemada
          Around your legs will this boot be bound. Do not be fooled by our usage of the word boot, for this boot is one made of wood. It contains scarce enough room inside for both of your legs, let alone the wedges that we will drive in once the boot is fitted. As each wedge is driven into the slot of the brodequin, it shall force your legs tighter against the constraints of the wood encasing them. When your legs can compress no more, your bones will snap from the pressure and agony will fill your body.
          His purpose is the relation between the desiring/reluctant body and the artistical unwearability of his clothes. Makes definitely sense.

          Comment

          • Fuuma
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2006
            • 4050

            I was just thinking that the best CCP garments need a body to negate it's realities.
            Selling CCP, Harnden, Raf, Rick etc.
            http://www.stylezeitgeist.com/forums...me-other-stuff

            Comment

            • Magician
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2008
              • 709

              Originally posted by Fuuma View Post
              I was just thinking that the best CCP garments need a body to negate it's realities.
              ...I think I agree with this?

              I would say that Poell absolutely designs with the body in mind, just not with comfort and ease (indeed sometimes the very opposite of such) in mind.

              An aspect that really draws me to "sz aesthetc clothing" is the idea that the wearer completes the piece, a concept that seems frequent in Poell.

              A drapey or overlong (or j-shaped or twist seam) item may be attractive and interesting on it's own, but it doesn't become fully realized until worn. This makes fashion,a traditionally passive artform for the viewer/wearer, active.

              Edit: Hah, I hope that doesn't sound too pretentious...
              Selling badass McQueen topcoat 48/38/M. I also write and tweet.

              Comment

              • mrbeuys
                Senior Member
                • May 2008
                • 2313

                <img src="http://www.hi-res.net/blog/images/RO/DERO.jpg"/>

                My uniform (RO, Ann, Attachment). And another crappy iPhone pic.
                Hi. I like your necklace. - It's actually a rape whistle, but the whistle part fell off.

                Comment

                • almroth
                  Senior Member
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 324

                  mrbeuys:
                  looking good!

                  Comment

                  • Jon
                    Senior Member
                    • Apr 2008
                    • 677

                    ^Agreed. Wish it was a better pic, though.
                    Originally posted by merz
                    perhaps one day pipcleo will post a wywt so non-euclydian & eldrich in its shapes as to turn all onlookers into throngs of dishevelled, muttering idiots

                    Comment

                    • philip nod
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2007
                      • 5903

                      ^ new rule, no iphone pics?
                      One wonders where it will end, when everything has become gay.

                      Comment

                      • Jon
                        Senior Member
                        • Apr 2008
                        • 677

                        Originally posted by philip nod View Post
                        ^ new rule, no iphone pics?
                        Lose the camera-phones, jerkwads!
                        Originally posted by merz
                        perhaps one day pipcleo will post a wywt so non-euclydian & eldrich in its shapes as to turn all onlookers into throngs of dishevelled, muttering idiots

                        Comment

                        • Fade to Black
                          Senior Member
                          • Sep 2008
                          • 5340

                          Originally posted by Spencer View Post



                          Detail just cuz...

                          well done
                          www.matthewhk.net

                          let me show you a few thangs

                          Comment

                          • asho
                            Senior Member
                            • Nov 2007
                            • 353

                            Originally posted by BECOMING-INTENSE View Post
                            But i do think he designs with bodies in mind, and without a body the tension, rigidity, intensities, restriction, etc. are lost. The rendering of these forces are only there in the relation between the work and the body. I see him as an artist to, but one who needs a body, like the choreographer who needs moving bodies.
                            “What is the body? We do not define it by saying that is it a field of forces, a nutrient ground fought over by a plurality of forces. For in fact there is no ‘medium’, no field of forces or battle. There is no quantity of reality, all reality is already quantity of force. There are nothing but quantities of force in mutual ‘relations of tension’. Every force is related to others and it either obeys or commands. What defines a body is this relation between dominant and dominated forces.”
                            Giles Deleuze
                            Nietzsche and Philosophy

                            the body and ccp cannot be separated

                            Comment

                            • Tiger
                              Banned
                              • Sep 2006
                              • 253

                              Originally posted by philip nod View Post
                              tiger
                              nobody cares that you made a suit from scratch. sorry.
                              it's fine
                              but you do and that's all it matters
                              you know it

                              Comment

                              • Jorge Hache
                                Senior Member
                                • Sep 2006
                                • 457

                                Originally posted by Tiger View Post
                                it's fine
                                but you do and that's all it matters
                                you know it
                                Nice Tiger
                                Will be great if you post some pics of the details

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X
                                😀
                                🥰
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎