Are you serious?! I did not know she made them in pony...but if that is true, then that is what I want....!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Women's Footwear
Collapse
X
-
I can never get excited about CLs somehow, i always find them to obviously feminine or something....
I def prefer the deceptive quality of the MMM's.
thanks for posting rider, they are excellent...I mean the ephemeral, the fugitive, the contingent, the half of art whose other half is the eternal and the immutable.
Comment
-
-
I can never get excited about Louboutins or MMMs...Last edited by genevieveryoko; 09-01-2011, 09:37 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by merz;( obvious 'girl fashion shoes' are obvious :(
i'll take a woman wearing those cloven hooves any day over the usual 'sea of shoes' material.
edit: then again, i'm not a girl. .
I am, and I feel very much the same. I do have 2 or 3 pairs of obviously "sexy" shoes, for the rare occasion when I feel they are needed, but that's becoming increasingly rare. I prefer flats anyway nowadays
Comment
-
-
wasnt quite prepared for the "deep" discussions to reach womens footwear. my take is if you like them, wear them, and if they happen to attract someone desirable to you, all the better. screw the whole theory if they hurt though...
on my way out to dinner wearing some very sexy phi boots.
Comment
-
-
This made me realise that sex appeal has completely left the scope of my preoccupation in general, and especially when it comes to my appearance. Doesn't mean I've turned into a sweatpants-sporting slob, just that I really don't care if I'm attractive to men. I'd go as far as to say I'd rather some men found me ugly or frumpy than otherwise (the chav/jock type)
This realisation scares me a little tbh
(here endeth the livejournal)
Comment
-
-
Nice post, Mona. I asked a question about open womens shoes a while ago, and this seems to be the most satisfying answer.Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde
StyleZeitgeist Magazine
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by rider View Postwasnt quite prepared for the "deep" discussions to reach womens footwear. my take is if you like them, wear them, and if they happen to attract someone desirable to you, all the better. screw the whole theory if they hurt though...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by merzits a good subject for discussion, i think, that was not fully-explored in the poell thread reactions. one quote in particular comes to mind, although i do not remember whom it is attributed to. to paraphrase, men are constantly watching women, whereas women are watching themselves through the eyes of those looking at them..
is the form of something extricable from what it contains, or what it potentially reveals?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by wire.artistI like the weirdo offering irl but as "bed shoes" a good pair of CL are hard to beat. I cherish my lynchxlouboutin book like no other...Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde
StyleZeitgeist Magazine
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by merzheh, lets street clear of male gaze, lest we raise the spirit of Lacan for the umptieth time upon this forum (by now his ghost wails in torment at the mere insinuation of SZ)
so i guess it isn't even sexiness of something so much as feeling powerful in whatever you wear, whether by feeling favourably objectified, in whole or in part, and desired, or by appearing mysterious and maybe even menacing.
my personal definition on that has always been more along the menacing lines.. there is nothing more compelling to me, at least visually, than something cold and unyielding. forms that seem to be indigestible to the traditional 'male gaze'Selling CCP, Harnden, Raf, Rick etc.
http://www.stylezeitgeist.com/forums...me-other-stuff
Comment
-
Comment