If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
dbc, I absolutely love everything about those, including your titles.I have a soft spot for the dog pics though, especially the first one....should be your personal mascot, methinks. [75]</P>
...I mean the ephemeral, the fugitive, the contingent, the half of art whose other half is the eternal and the immutable.
Here you go, Kira. It reminded me of the novel Perfume - Zuskind describes how the perfumer's house was built on the bridge. Off topic - never seen a good book result in such a terrible movie.</p>
</p>
Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde
[quote user="philip nod"]sorry if you mentioned this already, whats your weapon of choice?
[/quote]</p>
</p>
It shames me to admit this, but after having a really flossy Canon (I forget the exact model) stolen from me in barcelona six years ago, I've been using a hand-me-down from my mom Canon Powershot S30 (3.1 megapixel I think) from about that vintage...[:$]</p>
Maybe if I could stop spending money on SZ clothing, I could spring for something nicer...</p>
[quote user="philip nod"]sorry if you mentioned this already, whats your weapon of choice?
[/quote]</p>
</p>
It shames me to admit this, but after having a really flossy Canon (I forget the exact model) stolen from me in barcelona six years ago, I've been using a hand-me-down from my mom Canon Powershot S30 (3.1 megapixel I think) from about that vintage...[:$]</p>
Maybe if I could stop spending money on SZ clothing, I could spring for something nicer...</p>
[/quote]</p>
no shit. i've always thought megapixels are a joke. they keep uping them to 12 now on most prosumer cam, and i read an article that at 8 the difference becomes negligble, its just a selling point. i wonder how these look big.</p>
One wonders where it will end, when everything has become gay.
no shit. i've always thought megapixels are a joke. they keep uping them to 12 now on most prosumer cam, and i read an article that at 8 the difference becomes negligble, its just a selling point. i wonder how these look big.</p>
[/quote]</p>
Its sort of hit or miss whether a photo from my camera will suffer being made into an 8x10...some definitely still look great, but others, not at all. Past that size though, not a chance...</p>
</p>
I think i may have to start utilizing the RSG and save up for a decent camera with different lens options...especially given the job prospects for an econ masters these days...</p>
Anyone care to recommend a solid camera to shoot for (in the $1-1.5k range)?
</p>
[quote user="philip nod"]sorry if you mentioned this already, whats your weapon of choice?
[/quote]</p>
</p>
It shames me to admit this, but after having a really flossy Canon (I forget the exact model) stolen from me in barcelona six years ago, I've been using a hand-me-down from my mom Canon Powershot S30 (3.1 megapixel I think) from about that vintage...[:$]</p>
Maybe if I could stop spending money on SZ clothing, I could spring for something nicer...</p>
[/quote]</p>
no shit. i've always thought megapixels are a joke. they keep uping them to 12 now on most prosumer cam, and i read an article that at 8 the difference becomes negligble, its just a selling point. i wonder how these look big.</p>
[/quote]</p>
read about the same thing. things are only be discernible to the human eye to a certain point, beyond that it then does become negligible. but maybe the difference would become more apparent when blown up? never compared.
</p>
Distraction is an obstruction of the construction.
no shit. i've always thought megapixels are a joke. they keep uping them to 12 now on most prosumer cam, and i read an article that at 8 the difference becomes negligble, its just a selling point. i wonder how these look big.</p>
[/quote]</p>
Its sort of hit or miss whether a photo from my camera will suffer being made into an 8x10...some definitely still look great, but others, not at all. Past that size though, not a chance...</p>
</p>
I think i may have to start utilizing the RSG and save up for a decent camera with different lens options...especially given the job prospects for an econ masters these days...</p>
Anyone care to recommend a solid camera to shoot for (in the $1-1.5k range)?
</p>
[/quote]</p>
here's something that i do that works quite well. blow up your photo to 8x10 size. then have a new 8x10 negative made of it. then you are ballin' and you can ball your way up to 6x8ft and it looks nice.
</p>
the old digi camera are more forgiving and less digital than today, that perhaps is why your photos look very nice. </p>
One wonders where it will end, when everything has become gay.
Comment