Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hussein Chalayan

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Faust
    kitsch killer
    • Sep 2006
    • 37849

    But I kept this! :-) Members only on the outside, mind-blowing sartorial engineering on the inside. Individually signed by the tailor.





    Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde

    StyleZeitgeist Magazine

    Comment

    • tweeds
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2006
      • 246

      going to throw this out there for the Chalayan fans:
      does anyone feel that his collections carry too much attached text, like a 'How-To' guide to viewing his work? it's a thought that sometimes strikes, and from my perspective as someone who believes the work should speak for itself, can sometimes be disconcerting. the underlying text is a good narrative, of course, and it makes for fascinating layers. but sometimes i want to watch the clothes, pure, in their context without a guidebook holding my hand...

      this is not in any way meant to deprecate Chalayan, his collections have produced some truly remarkable moments in the fashion consciousness.
      SITE | TWITTER

      Comment

      • Faust
        kitsch killer
        • Sep 2006
        • 37849

        /\ maybe, but he has stopped doing those labels about 4 years ago, I think.
        Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde

        StyleZeitgeist Magazine

        Comment

        • laika
          moderator
          • Sep 2006
          • 3785

          tweeds, any chance you can provide an example of such a text?
          i'm really interested in your question, but it would be helpful to have something concrete to think about.....

          Faust, maybe we can go look at the dress tomorrow...i'm not even sure it fits quite, as its a size larger than i normally take. honestly, being in the presence of pre 04 Chalayan causes me to lose all semblance of sanity and objective judgement. help!
          ...I mean the ephemeral, the fugitive, the contingent, the half of art whose other half is the eternal and the immutable.

          Comment

          • Faust
            kitsch killer
            • Sep 2006
            • 37849

            /\ I go where you go. I think tweeds is referring to my jacket's label.
            Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde

            StyleZeitgeist Magazine

            Comment

            • zamb
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2006
              • 5834

              Originally posted by laika View Post
              tweeds, any chance you can provide an example of such a text?
              i'm really interested in your question, but it would be helpful to have something concrete to think about.....

              Faust, maybe we can go look at the dress tomorrow...i'm not even sure it fits quite, as its a size larger than i normally take. honestly, being in the presence of pre 04 Chalayan causes me to lose all semblance of sanity and objective judgement. help!
              why do you want to wait till tomorrow?, it might not even be there,
              A dress like that should be bought the very moment it is spotted!
              Buy first, try on later.............
              “You know,” he says, with a resilient smile, “it is a hard world for poets.”
              .................................................. .......................


              Zam Barrett Spring 2017 Now in stock

              Comment

              • laika
                moderator
                • Sep 2006
                • 3785

                ^totally useless, the lot of you....

                actually, Zam, the fit issue was in the shoulders--when i raise my arm the entire dress comes up with it! is this something that's fixable? it's something with the armholes, i think, they didn't fit close enough to my body....

                i am in need of your services for a couple of small things, btw...
                ...I mean the ephemeral, the fugitive, the contingent, the half of art whose other half is the eternal and the immutable.

                Comment

                • zamb
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2006
                  • 5834

                  Originally posted by laika View Post
                  ^totally useless, the lot of you....

                  actually, Zam, the fit issue was in the shoulders--when i raise my arm the entire dress comes up with it! is this something that's fixable? it's something with the armholes, i think, they didn't fit close enough to my body....

                  i am in need of your services for a couple of small things, btw...
                  on a normal dress I would say that it is, but with chalayan, nothing is ever normal, I would have to see how it is constructed, my chedule is not hectic, but kind of unpredictable, but maybe i might be able to tug along with you and the Bicycle Man,

                  I dont want to work for you because you dont love me anymore
                  Just kidding, just kidding, I know your love is unwavering..........
                  we will speak maybe later or tomorrow and see what we can arrange
                  “You know,” he says, with a resilient smile, “it is a hard world for poets.”
                  .................................................. .......................


                  Zam Barrett Spring 2017 Now in stock

                  Comment

                  • laika
                    moderator
                    • Sep 2006
                    • 3785

                    of course i love you baby!
                    i'm just having an affair with plato, at the moment,
                    and he is ever so demanding, the bastard.

                    i'll send you a pm....who on earth is the bicycle man?
                    ...I mean the ephemeral, the fugitive, the contingent, the half of art whose other half is the eternal and the immutable.

                    Comment

                    • zamb
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2006
                      • 5834

                      Originally posted by laika View Post
                      of course i love you baby!
                      i'm just having an affair with plato, at the moment,
                      and he is ever so demanding, the bastard.

                      i'll send you a pm....who on earth is the bicycle man?
                      photography is truth baby, photography is truth................


                      “You know,” he says, with a resilient smile, “it is a hard world for poets.”
                      .................................................. .......................


                      Zam Barrett Spring 2017 Now in stock

                      Comment

                      • tweeds
                        Senior Member
                        • Sep 2006
                        • 246

                        Originally posted by laika View Post
                        tweeds, any chance you can provide an example of such a text?
                        i'm really interested in your question, but it would be helpful to have something concrete to think about.....
                        Faust is right, the labels are one thing - a side note here, i didn't know he discontinued that style of label 4 years ago, that ties in with the collections i really felt a little lost by, around 2005 - but for me there is sometimes a more general gap between the text and the clothes...

                        one example is Inertia (SS09), where Chalayan stated that "it's about the speed in our lives and how it can only result in a crash" - something that was further developed in the Design Museum blurb as well - but what we effectively got was a series of prints culminating in latex dresses. while i like the concept, and the car graveyard images idea, the final output felt a little far from the ideas behind it. when i saw the latex pieces at the retrospective the first response was a wow, but after that a little disappointment that it was a basic piece of sculpture with the print (and concept) layered on it.

                        going back to 2005, and the Genometrics (AW05) show along with the film Absent Presence, with his favourite themes of technology and ethnicity. watching the film and reading his basis for the collection (DNA mapping and reaction to London soundscapes), i felt that the connection between clothes and text was quite lost. ironically by making known the text, the clothes almost seemed diminished...

                        again, in no way am i deprecating Chalayan's work, i'm just curious if anyone feels like i do. his earliest work, like Airmail and Afterwords, really managed to connect his thematic interests with wild technical ability. i feel like this potency has been diluted through a disconnect of the two, his narrative becoming more complex and his technical ability really coming out in terms of creating spectacle, but both moving in different directions, so that this hand-holding of clothes with text feels constricting.

                        caveat: i've not read much about his most recent work after SS09, so have little idea about his approaches after that.
                        SITE | TWITTER

                        Comment

                        • rider
                          eyes of the world
                          • Jun 2009
                          • 1536

                          an interesting body of work...to say the least.

                          post 157 particularly hit home for me.

                          for laika

                          Comment

                          • droogist
                            Senior Member
                            • Sep 2006
                            • 583

                            He only used the "texty" label for one season of the women's line, S/S 2004. He might have used it more than once for the men's line. His diffusion line had similar - albeit much abbreviated - text on the hangtags, but not on the labels themselves.

                            Originally posted by tweeds View Post
                            Faust is right, the labels are one thing - a side note here, i didn't know he discontinued that style of label 4 years ago, that ties in with the collections i really felt a little lost by, around 2005 - but for me there is sometimes a more general gap between the text and the clothes...

                            one example is Inertia (SS09), where Chalayan stated that "it's about the speed in our lives and how it can only result in a crash" - something that was further developed in the Design Museum blurb as well - but what we effectively got was a series of prints culminating in latex dresses. while i like the concept, and the car graveyard images idea, the final output felt a little far from the ideas behind it. when i saw the latex pieces at the retrospective the first response was a wow, but after that a little disappointment that it was a basic piece of sculpture with the print (and concept) layered on it.

                            going back to 2005, and the Genometrics (AW05) show along with the film Absent Presence, with his favourite themes of technology and ethnicity. watching the film and reading his basis for the collection (DNA mapping and reaction to London soundscapes), i felt that the connection between clothes and text was quite lost. ironically by making known the text, the clothes almost seemed diminished...

                            again, in no way am i deprecating Chalayan's work, i'm just curious if anyone feels like i do. his earliest work, like Airmail and Afterwords, really managed to connect his thematic interests with wild technical ability. i feel like this potency has been diluted through a disconnect of the two, his narrative becoming more complex and his technical ability really coming out in terms of creating spectacle, but both moving in different directions, so that this hand-holding of clothes with text feels constricting.

                            caveat: i've not read much about his most recent work after SS09, so have little idea about his approaches after that.
                            I think you're misrepresenting the extent to which he uses text; it's not like he publishes a dissertation every time he shows. Usually he articulates ideas in the exact same way that just about every other designer does, which is as a response to some backstage interviewer's inevitable "Can you tell us a little about the ideas behind this collection...?" question.

                            Chalayan does choose to communicate a lot of often very complex ideas through his shows, more so than any other designer I can think of, and for that I'm grateful. At the same time, I question to what extent it's his responsibility to make these ideas coherent for his audience, at least as regards his collections (I would judge his art/film/installation work by a different standard). As a fashion designer, his primary objective isn't to elucidate, but to make clothing. He once said in an interview that while he acknowledges the fact that the conceptual elements more often than not fly right over people's heads, he simple can't work any other way. In other words, clothes aren't so much a medium by which he delivers ideas, as ideas are the means by which he makes clothes.

                            There's no denying the pleasure to be had when viewing a beautiful collection and feeling like you "get it," but I don't consider "getting it" a necessary prerequistie for appreciating a collection. Some of the themes he's worked with, like those for "Genometrics" or "Temporal Meditations," were so personal that I'm not even sure we're meant to understand them. And the fact remains that a lot of his more opaque or convoluted ideas have resulted in some astonishing collections ("Panoramic" A/W 2008 comes to mind).

                            I guess what I'm saying is that I disagree...
                            Last edited by droogist; 11-06-2009, 01:29 PM.

                            Comment

                            • droogist
                              Senior Member
                              • Sep 2006
                              • 583

                              Originally posted by tweeds
                              i have a little related comment contrasting Chalayan with Bernhard Wilhelm, but we'll leave that for now... thoughts appreciated.
                              Let's hear it!

                              Comment

                              • tweeds
                                Senior Member
                                • Sep 2006
                                • 246

                                Originally posted by droogist View Post
                                I think you're misrepresenting the extent to which he uses text; it's not like he publishes a dissertation every time he shows. Usually he articulates ideas in the exact same way that just about every other designer does, which is as a response to some backstage interviewer's inevitable "Can you tell us a little about the ideas behind this collection...?" question.
                                an explanation for why we disagree on the extent to which he uses text: it stems from his exhibition here in London, which blew me away, but at the same time really pushed an enormous amount of text at me that resulted in this disconnect.

                                of course exhibitions are different worlds from collections, and the actual collection probably wouldn't have given me this feeling as much. exhibition = collections overwrought, if you like...

                                Originally posted by droogist View Post
                                I guess what I'm saying is that I disagree...
                                disagreement aside, Chalayan is still a designer who creates fascinating work. thanks for the thoughts

                                wilhelm: same masterful technical ability at the core, but no text, pure visual language, strange and fantastic vocabulary. something along those lines, i forget the specifics now
                                SITE | TWITTER

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X
                                😀
                                🥰
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎