Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Yohji Files For Bankruptcy Protection, Finds Investor

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cjbreed
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 2711

    #16
    Originally posted by agentred View Post
    But in fairness Y made the cardinal mistake of too many fixed assets.

    They opened huge stores in too many big cities and small cities (London OK but Antwerp wtf?!) without the advertising/sales to support them.

    Look at CDG, a much MUCH bigger brand but they only have what? A few flagship stores and the rest are all pop ups which open and close in months to avoid long term fixed contracts. Even the fixed stores usually sell a host of other brands to appeal to a wider customer base and get more asses through the door. In contrast, I don't think I've ever been in a Y store with more customers than staff...

    I'm not familiar with Japanese bankruptcy filings, but if this forces a restructuring of the company and sells off the stores to pay creditors it can only be a good thing.
    i feel like he also had too many lines. diluted his brand maybe. i dunno. works for some but not for everyone. and overexpansion kills lots of businesses that otherwise have a solid foundation/business model. fuckin sad no matter what...
    dying and coming back gives you considerable perspective

    Comment

    • Fade to Black
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2008
      • 5340

      #17
      CdG's reach in terms of overexpansion beats that of YY's by far. Their store is littered with plastic bags of white t-shirts with the parfum/dover street market logo available for sale...it was pretty disheartening and I couldn't stay in there for longer than 5 minutes.

      I think the one thing that really sank this ship was artistic integrity, sad to say.
      www.matthewhk.net

      let me show you a few thangs

      Comment

      • cjbreed
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2009
        • 2711

        #18
        Originally posted by Fade to Black View Post
        CdG's reach in terms of overexpansion beats that of YY's by far. Their store is littered with plastic bags of white t-shirts with the parfum/dover street market logo available for sale...it was pretty disheartening and I couldn't stay in there for longer than 5 minutes.

        I think the one thing that really sank this ship was artistic integrity, sad to say.
        i was thinking about CdG right as i posted that and you are right. but its not overexpansion if it doesn't bankrupt you.
        dying and coming back gives you considerable perspective

        Comment

        • agentred
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2009
          • 143

          #19
          Originally posted by Fade to Black View Post
          CdG's reach in terms of overexpansion beats that of YY's by far. Their store is littered with plastic bags of white t-shirts with the parfum/dover street market logo available for sale...it was pretty disheartening and I couldn't stay in there for longer than 5 minutes.

          I think the one thing that really sank this ship was artistic integrity, sad to say.
          I can't really agree with this.

          You're right that CDG's brand is completely diluted. But it makes them a lot of money, they don't have to advertise when they can team up with the Rolling Stones and have an instant buyer base. Same thing with Speedo and The Beatles and all the collabs : Low costs on advertising and manufacturing, the same high revenues.

          In contrast, YY tried to do the same thing but it wasn't successful. Look at the Y-3 Adidas label, those things are skankier than skank.

          YY and CDG are both in it for the bottom line, no exceptions. Any large fashion house is, really, some are just more successful than others.

          Comment

          • mononon
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2009
            • 1041

            #20
            yeah, i think both CDG and YY are somewhat overplayed...mainly due to the YYxAdidas Y3 and play CDG lines, which are both terrible and are based on hype, especially since both are more affordable to the general mass. That being said, if anything Y3 helped Yohji since it helped him gain more of a based since they sell them at more mid level stores...etc. then again, y3 and cdg play are faked like no other
            calvinc - "Found this place and omg the people here are so cool and they dress super ultra mega well!"

            Comment

            • jcotteri
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2008
              • 1328

              #21
              Originally posted by agentred View Post
              I can't really agree with this.

              You're right that CDG's brand is completely diluted. But it makes them a lot of money, they don't have to advertise when they can team up with the Rolling Stones and have an instant buyer base. Same thing with Speedo and The Beatles and all the collabs : Low costs on advertising and manufacturing, the same high revenues.

              In contrast, YY tried to do the same thing but it wasn't successful. Look at the Y-3 Adidas label, those things are skankier than skank.

              YY and CDG are both in it for the bottom line, no exceptions. Any large fashion house is, really, some are just more successful than others.
              Y-3 is extremely successful... Hence why Adidas Japan helped broker the new deal..
              WTB: This

              Comment

              • Avantster
                ¤¤¤
                • Sep 2006
                • 1983

                #22
                Originally posted by agentred View Post
                I can't really agree with this.

                You're right that CDG's brand is completely diluted. But it makes them a lot of money, they don't have to advertise when they can team up with the Rolling Stones and have an instant buyer base. Same thing with Speedo and The Beatles and all the collabs : Low costs on advertising and manufacturing, the same high revenues.

                In contrast, YY tried to do the same thing but it wasn't successful. Look at the Y-3 Adidas label, those things are skankier than skank.

                YY and CDG are both in it for the bottom line, no exceptions. Any large fashion house is, really, some are just more successful than others.
                If you're going to talk about 'large' fashion houses we should consider that size is relative and compared to YY inc, houses such as Marc Jacobs, Lanvin, Dior have easily more than five times the turnover. A conglomerate like LVMH has 250 times more. Sometimes it's easy to forget just how marginal some of the designers we love are.
                let us raise a toast to ancient cotton, rotten voile, gloomy silk, slick carf, decayed goat, inflamed ram, sooty nelton, stifling silk, lazy sheep, bone-dry broad & skinny baffalo.

                Comment

                • Faust
                  kitsch killer
                  • Sep 2006
                  • 37849

                  #23
                  /\ Exactly. When people say Rick is big, for example, I always think, compared to whom?
                  Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde

                  StyleZeitgeist Magazine

                  Comment

                  • agentred
                    Senior Member
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 143

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Avantster View Post
                    If you're going to talk about 'large' fashion houses we should consider that size is relative and compared to YY inc, houses such as Marc Jacobs, Lanvin, Dior have easily more than five times the turnover. A conglomerate like LVMH has 250 times more. Sometimes it's easy to forget just how marginal some of the designers we love are.
                    You're exactly right though, think of it this way: Lanvin has five times the turnover and far less stores. On the other hand, Dior has more stores, but it can afford to build a flagship in every major city because it has the turnover.

                    Y tried to do both and failed, if it wasn't a major fashion house it shouldn't have tried to spend like one!

                    Comment

                    • Fade to Black
                      Senior Member
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 5340

                      #25
                      Valid points in the above few posts since my last - it's all relative...and I'm not sure how much this factors into the entire picture, but I also wonder if the downfall of Yohji's business has to take into consideration his refusal to cut corners like so many other big(ger) fashion entities have. The guy was really pushing hard with top of the line fabrics and utilizing maximum fabric surface area for his pieces (and i don't just mean in terms of the volume of a piece - with the way some of his stuff is constructed it really is requiring more handwork and material). Except he didn't have a trademark global accessories branding strategy to keep him afloat - i get the sense high end "clothes" alone are a loss everywhere. So I'd assert that it's not so much YY wasn't a high end fashion house but rather he wasn't linked in any way to a much larger conglomerate with diversified revenue branches at disposal to keep the machine running.
                      www.matthewhk.net

                      let me show you a few thangs

                      Comment

                      • Faust
                        kitsch killer
                        • Sep 2006
                        • 37849

                        #26
                        FtB, I think the point was not that he wasn't a luxury house, but he was just not big enough. It's not Chanel. He failed at some things that others succeeded at - perfume - fail, couture - fail. I am not saying it's his fault. Anyway, he is retiring a very wealthy man - I wouldn't feel bad for him personally. We'll see what the future holds for him.
                        Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde

                        StyleZeitgeist Magazine

                        Comment

                        • agentred
                          Senior Member
                          • Jul 2009
                          • 143

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Faust View Post
                          Anyway, he is retiring a very wealthy man - I wouldn't feel bad for him personally. We'll see what the future holds for him.
                          That's something that always gets me, how ballin' are the Japanese designers compared to their Western counterparts?

                          I would assume they're richer because even though they don't have as high sales they still have a larger amount of capital in the company, whereas Western designers depend on private equity investors/existing infrastructure. So, for instance....

                          Nigo > Marc Ecko
                          Juna Watanabe > Marc Jacobs
                          Rei K > Vivienne Westwood

                          Amirite?

                          Comment

                          • Faust
                            kitsch killer
                            • Sep 2006
                            • 37849

                            #28
                            I don't know - the numbers are top secret. I am sure they are all a-Ok.
                            Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde

                            StyleZeitgeist Magazine

                            Comment

                            • jgan85
                              Senior Member
                              • Apr 2008
                              • 337

                              #29
                              sad..
                              $76m debt is a huge mountain though
                              ________
                              JEEP CHEROKEE (XJ) HISTORY
                              Last edited by jgan85; 04-05-2011, 08:24 PM.

                              Comment

                              • Fade to Black
                                Senior Member
                                • Sep 2008
                                • 5340

                                #30
                                Originally posted by agentred View Post

                                Juna Watanabe > Marc Jacobs

                                insightful analogy, this particular one was dead on.

                                Junya can't be balling that much though...without the Comme umbrella. Who's actually buying his stuff? Unless he's like the designer equivalent of those under-the-radar tycoons quietly amassing a fortune whilst unassumingly going out in nondescript clothing and presence.
                                www.matthewhk.net

                                let me show you a few thangs

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X
                                😀
                                🥰
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎