Undercover S/S 16

[radio-aktivität]

With Fausts explanation, the whole collection makes kind of sense. This is just another example of how important context is to any kind of creative output, not only a fashion collection.
The next question would be wether or not such a contextual quality (in lack for a better term I just made that up) is a desirable thing, or if creative output should be able to excel for itself. Personally, I think context is of outmost importance, yet the product should have a certain quality on it's own. The context then is a fantastic added value, and makes us appreciate something we already quite like even more.

To not derail this any further: this is indeed a joy to look at. And we all know what Ian might think about the Isolation.

[Dropt]

Definitely some interesting pieces here. I wouldn't say that everything is great, as not all Undercover collections are visually successful in my view. And we're missing a few good ones here… SS07, SS09?

However – by any creative stretch, the star wars prints are still complete shit.

[ProfMonnitoff]

I like a lot of these clothes (a few are terrible, for example the star wars stuff) and it makes sense as a collection. There's items here that many people will love.

But wow what a terrible way to present this. This is one of the worst lookbooks I've ever seen. Jun has never been great at lookbooks, but this one is atrocious even by his standards.

[Fuuma]

I like pants, will prob buy some pants. PANTS! Collection is fine except the star wars stuff.

[lowrey]

Have to echo what Faust already mentioned, the collection was very cool but unfortunately the lookbook makes it all look very bland. Everything from the styling to the modeling to the photography, this would be fitting for Uniqlo or something..

[Faust]

I like pants, will prob buy some pants. PANTS! Collection is fine except the star wars stuff.

Pants are fantastic. And range from very expensive to quite inexpensive.

[DudleyGray]

Jesus god, I want those scab things. I'm guessing they're in the "quite expensive" range? And they will go quickly and won't hit sales racks.

[Faust]

Yes, they will be $$$. I only remember seeing the skirted version, which was quite expensive.

[yay]

With the prices i see for the og scab jeans, those will definitely sell out quickly i would assume.

[tong1801]

Loving a lot of the scab stuff especially the pouch and the jeans. Quite surprised there is only one look for SS06 'T'. One lf my favorite collection from Jun. Or are there actually more stuff from that season just that it's not in the lookbook?

[neostrifeX]

While I do wish some collections like FW2006 were present, I have to echo and say I love the Scab jeans. Especially now that they seem slimmer than the OG pair.

[Faust]

Loving a lot of the scab stuff especially the pouch and the jeans. Quite surprised there is only one look for SS06 'T'. One lf my favorite collection from Jun. Or are there actually more stuff from that season just that it's not in the lookbook?

Yes, there is more.

[Faust]

While I do wish some collections like FW2006 were present, I have to echo and say I love the Scab jeans. Especially now that they seem slimmer than the OG pair.

I took mine to a tailor to taper the leg from the knew down and now I wear them all the time.

[Fuuma]

Pants are fantastic. And range from very expensive to quite inexpensive.

I like the leaf pants, any info, not very knowledgeable on undercover TBH.

[SafetyKat]

Looks like Disney is throwing some funds for some designer Star Wars gear



Kidding aside, Im very interested in the scab pieces. Plus, I have to admit my eye keeps going back to the "ambivalent" sith and jedi look Im guessing Takahashi is a rabid space geek?