Originally posted by croatoan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Yes or No?
Collapse
X
-
Hobo: We all dress up. We all put on our armour before we walk out the door, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that we’re trying to be someone else.
-
-
timeless and classic are surely the same thing ?
jackets that are 'different' and 'classic' at the same time are the jackets to make massive financial investment in. Nobody wants to spend big money on a jacket that might be 'classic' but with no real wow factor. timeless and classic are just other words for boring in many cases.
Comment
-
-
MidnightBlue: You raise a valid point, but you forget the fact that in some cases/some people might actually prefere the classic over the eyecatching unique baller baller styles.
If you look at most of the leather jackets that hedi designed for DH, those styles are pretty basic and timeless in design IMO, but they still manage to be outstanding and have a huge "wow" factor thanks to aspects such as quality and cut, and they may very well be worth the money investment. Its all a matter of taste and context.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Acid, Bitter and Sad View Postmixing things up a little... :)
or
My own take:
I like RO jackets a lot (recently purchased another one), they're a little more lived in or quirky and less straight up punk aggressive than Julius, they also tend to fit a little looser (with correct shoulders, still a tight fit) than Julius, which I appreciate as it allows me to layer a little. This is not to disparage Julius, which I have tried numerous times and found terrific, but to say why I prefer one and you might prefer the other. To me Julius is, at it's best, a label that represents unrelenting youthful aggression and I find it amazing for that reason (that and the post-apocalyptic undertones). RO jackets have some sort of mature, blasé air about them that gels with my wardrobe in a way than Julius don't.Selling CCP, Harnden, Raf, Rick etc.
http://www.stylezeitgeist.com/forums...me-other-stuff
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by beardown View PostI agree with this...the newer Rick stuff without the wool cuffs seem less 'signature' to me but the fact remains that the wool is functional, warm and classic.Selling CCP, Harnden, Raf, Rick etc.
http://www.stylezeitgeist.com/forums...me-other-stuff
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by quiet noise View PostMidnightBlue: You raise a valid point, but you forget the fact that in some cases/some people might actually prefere the classic over the eyecatching unique baller baller styles.
If you look at most of the leather jackets that hedi designed for DH, those styles are pretty basic and timeless in design IMO, but they still manage to be outstanding and have a huge "wow" factor thanks to aspects such as quality and cut, and they may very well be worth the money investment. Its all a matter of taste and context.
Comment
-
-
Another thing:
Julius: columnar fit (think DH), great if you're slim and want to accentuate it with a tight fit. Watch out for weird bulges. It can look pretty cool contrasted with baggy pants tucked into boots. While you may be tempted to go for an entirely slim look I believe it is more of an invitation to play with volume elsewhere.
Rick Owens:a little more tapered, depending on your build it can either shape the chest, be slightly lose or fit your athletic physique. You really have to try them on before purchasing as the effect can be hit or miss. When it works it reminds me of Carpe leather shirts, sorta make you look tougher in a subtle and masculine way.Selling CCP, Harnden, Raf, Rick etc.
http://www.stylezeitgeist.com/forums...me-other-stuff
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Fuuma View PostThose are quite different, just go by your favoured look and don't worry about quality or "timelessness". I don't think either is so rooted in current trends that they'll look stupid in two yrs.
My own take:
I like RO jackets a lot (recently purchased another one), they're a little more lived in or quirky and less straight up punk aggressive than Julius, they also tend to fit a little looser (with correct shoulders, still a tight fit) than Julius, which I appreciate as it allows me to layer a little. This is not to disparage Julius, which I have tried numerous times and found terrific, but to say why I prefer one and you might prefer the other. To me Julius is, at it's best, a label that represents unrelenting youthful aggression and I find it amazing for that reason (that and the post-apocalyptic undertones). RO jackets have some sort of mature, blasé air about them that gels with my wardrobe in a way than Julius don't.An artist is not paid for his labor, but for his vision. - James Whistler
Originally posted by BBSCCPI order 1 in every size, please, for every occasion
Comment
-
-
Any pictures of the oiled leather version from AW0910?
this one is from archive. though they called it washed-something. im not an expert by any means but this is how i would imagine oiled leather to be anyway. but nevertheless, its hella nice.
aslo here: http://www.luisaviaroma.com/index.as...seasProdID=50I
Comment
-
-
Fuuma nailed it. Again.Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde
StyleZeitgeist Magazine
Comment
-
-
agreed. especially,
"When it works it reminds me of Carpe leather shirts, sorta make you look tougher in a subtle and masculine way."
i've always felt this way, without being able to explain why. just the way ro jackets fit, shoulders and torso, shape the body in a flattering masculine way.
i also have found myself in this situation, julius vs ro leather. currently i own the fw07 julius moto and a non leather ro moto. the ro moto was my fist ro peice, and have worn it relentlessly since then. it is my favorite cut, and would love to have the leather version some day. the only reason why i chose julius over ro is because the julius popped up first, with a good price. about sizing, my julius is a 2 and my ro is a m.
Comment
-
Comment