Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Label Under Construction (Luca Laurini)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AKA*NYC
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2007
    • 3007

    ^ the somewhat sloppy and seemingly arbitrarily applied crimson dye on the gray side of the knit paired with the nail polish traces on the model's fingernails makes for a messy yet interesting combo. pair with carbon m.a+ 5 pockets and live in - or be - the moment.
    LOVE THE SHIRST... HOW much?

    Comment

    • MoFiya
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2007
      • 1438

      Ha, didnt even notice the fingernails of the model. Coherent styling, I'ld say I prefer the fit of the model at Ink though as it is more fitted...
      I have dreams of orca whales and owls
      But I wake up in fear

      BBS for sale (Sz 48-52)

      Comment

      • MoFiya
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2007
        • 1438

        Yeah, crazy, right?
        That also a reason why I asked for the fabric...
        I have dreams of orca whales and owls
        But I wake up in fear

        BBS for sale (Sz 48-52)

        Comment

        • Chinorlz
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2006
          • 6422

          We've lost all control. A long sleeve knit, a pair of jeans, a belt and some sneakers can now set you back $5000.
          www.AlbertHuangMD.com - Digital Portfolio Of Projects & Designs

          Merz (5/22/09):"i'm a firm believer that the ultimate prevailing logic in design is 'does shit look sick as fuck' "

          Comment

          • gavagai
            Senior Member
            • May 2010
            • 468

            $5,000? Come on now we don't need to exaggerate.

            LS Knit LUC = $1,500
            LUC "Jeans" = $1,500
            A1923 Trainers = $1,500

            Seriously just skip the belt and you have $500 left for underwear and a cheap blanket in case it is cold outside.

            Comment

            • lazyguru
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2008
              • 268

              Would someone care to post feedback on these pants , Are they shiny in black , does the fly yarn look overdone or is it subtle enough to be worn daily? Thanks



              Comment

              • Faust
                kitsch killer
                • Sep 2006
                • 37849

                The pants are amazing - nice and slim, not overdone at all. The black is not shiny.
                Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde

                StyleZeitgeist Magazine

                Comment

                • lazyguru
                  Senior Member
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 268

                  Thanks Faust ,
                  Needed just that little reassurance to activate my trigger finger :)

                  Comment

                  • cjbreed
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 2711

                    running more true to size (slimmer waist) than previous versions i believe.
                    dying and coming back gives you considerable perspective

                    Comment

                    • lazyguru
                      Senior Member
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 268

                      Shit ! So go a size up like the anatomic J pants then?

                      Comment

                      • magic
                        Senior Member
                        • Feb 2009
                        • 1404

                        they both fits the same in the waist, the only different was the anatomical j-pant fits slimmer in the calf.
                        Focusing on object details

                        Comment

                        • cjbreed
                          Senior Member
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 2711

                          no what i am saying is that for example the waist on a size 50 traditional j pant was usually like 17.5" or so and this season it is 16.5" or even smaller. thats based on the 3 pair i own and the measurements i was provided this season by 2 different retailers. not talking about anatomical j pant here
                          dying and coming back gives you considerable perspective

                          Comment

                          • lazyguru
                            Senior Member
                            • Jun 2008
                            • 268

                            Thanks breeder & magic saved me some heartache!

                            Will take sizing discussion offline now

                            Comment

                            • Phantom
                              Senior Member
                              • Mar 2011
                              • 163

                              is the Luc linen j-pants supposed to have kind a overlock seam in the crotch? or have I just teared mine. but no holes or anything.

                              Comment

                              • Faust
                                kitsch killer
                                • Sep 2006
                                • 37849

                                Originally posted by lazyguru View Post
                                Shit ! So go a size up like the anatomic J pants then?
                                True to size.
                                Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months - Oscar Wilde

                                StyleZeitgeist Magazine

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X
                                😀
                                🥰
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎