I gathered as much until I got to "but still very high". I see your intended implication is preserved in the statement, but wanted to clarify. I tend to read into things that aren't there sometimes.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Label Under Construction (Luca Laurini)
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Faustfuck you, i don't have an attitude problem.
Sartorialoft
"She is very ninja, no?" ~Peter Jevnikar
-
-
Originally posted by Fuuma View PostThe unconscious IS a language, don't make Lacan wake up from the dead and spank you.
Please tell me we have moved on from Lancan, or
I'll personally come and spank you!
Wrong, the unconscious is an immanent 'factory'. which has
to be made at the same time as it invests social relations.
Another problem with Lacan, he doesn't properly connect the
unconscious to the social field.Last edited by BECOMING-INTENSE; 02-24-2009, 12:55 PM.Are you afraid of women, Doctor?
Of course.
www.becomingmads.com
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BECOMING-INTENSE View Post
Please tell me we have moved on from Lancan, or
I'll personally come and spank you!Selling CCP, Harnden, Raf, Rick etc.
http://www.stylezeitgeist.com/forums...me-other-stuff
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Fuuma View PostI dunno, I barely understand what BI tries to say as he seems to be trying to communicate outside "language" and I'm a westerner, no can do that. Civilization of the commentary FTW!...I mean the ephemeral, the fugitive, the contingent, the half of art whose other half is the eternal and the immutable.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by laika View PostI'm not fluent in B-I, but using Lacan to oppose a blatantly deleuzian point of view is rehashing old philosophical wars, no?Selling CCP, Harnden, Raf, Rick etc.
http://www.stylezeitgeist.com/forums...me-other-stuff
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by merz..........................
Sooo gooood!!Originally posted by Faustfuck you, i don't have an attitude problem.
Sartorialoft
"She is very ninja, no?" ~Peter Jevnikar
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by merzalthough i recognise that our debate here has been something of a derailment in and of itself, this last bit is utter wankery. now we're arguing if one dead fellow was more on point than another.
please....I mean the ephemeral, the fugitive, the contingent, the half of art whose other half is the eternal and the immutable.
Comment
-
Comment